Laserfiche WebLink
4� <br /> that the subdivision be of a parcel that appears n <br /> pp on a 1985 . z. <br /> Assessor' s Map and that five (5) or fewer lots are created. The <br /> proposed plan would result in five (5) or fewer lots the , <br /> ' will be subdivided parcel <br /> which ided does not appear on the 19 8 5 map, <br /> therefore does not meet both criteria of the exemption. j <br /> Accordingly, my opinion Applicant must provide Water Quality as <br /> required by 174-2 7A, <br /> { <br /> Mr. Druley stated his belief that the 6.2 acre parcel does ' ,:, <br /> in fact show on the 1985 m <br /> maps., when the <br /> p property was put under <br /> Agreement there were three (3) lots in the front, approved b the =s. <br /> Planning Board on an ANR Plan l y <br /> g pus Lot 2 . There was aI j . <br /> subsequent Preliminary Hearing for Lot 2 to be subdivided into _ <br /> three (3) additional lots. The Definitive Hearing is scheduled. ''' <br /> with the Planning Board for May 61 1998. :�: <br /> Mr. Druley argued the 6.2 acres is not one lot per two ,yAp <br /> acres; but rather one lot per acre approximately. He stated the ;. <br /> parcel is surrounded by five hundred (5 0 0) acres of conservation <br /> land, which also shows on the 1985 maps. He made the point that .=f <br /> there is an impact of approximately one lot per every ninety to <br /> ninety--five (90-95) acres, He also referred, to that section of <br /> the Mashpee Water Quality Study Bylaw, stating that any Water <br /> Quality Study prepared for this parcel would not be very <br /> extensive or expensive for him. He stated he would attempt to � <br /> have it ready for the May 6 th Hearing, if the Planning Board <br /> decides it is required. <br /> lip* <br /> Mr. Druley proposed taking one lot and agreed to do a 5: ~` <br /> denitri f i cat ion system, which would eliminate approximately <br /> ninety (9 0%-) percent of the nitrates, resulting in a five (5) <br /> of subdivision surrounded by five hundred (50 0) acres of <br /> conservation. <br /> The Chairman determined the Planning Board did not have the <br /> authority to vary the Bylaw in this situation, <br /> rlF E� <br /> The Chairman entertained a Motion be made in this matter. <br /> r r <br /> MOTION: Chance Reichel made a Motion that the Planning <br /> Board provide a Vote to Applicant, John Druley, Quaker Homes. r , <br /> Great oak Road Subdivision of the requirement of providing a <br /> Water Quality Report for the Definitive Plan in accordance with i <br /> Town. of Mashpee Bylaw 174--2 7A, and the opinion of Town Counsel; <br /> which Motion was seconded by Dennis Balzarini and so voted ' <br /> unanimously. (This matter concluded at 10 .30 p.m. ) <br /> L <br /> Public Hearing <br /> Amendments to Mashpee Local Comprehensive PlanVol <br /> r !� <br /> The Public Hearing in this matter was reconvened at this <br /> Point, <br /> : <br /> -27_ <br /> y L <br />