Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Board is to consider those issues that will impact the <br /> population at large. The Planning Board does not have authority <br /> - and is limited to the internal workings of a small community. <br /> He further stated there may be some good-faith language that <br /> could be included in the Modification regarding the future design <br /> being compatible and appropriate with existing buildings. <br /> Attorney Butler stated that contiguous phasing would allow <br /> an opportunity for the Developer, Planning Board and Unit owners <br /> to work together. <br /> s � Mr. Eldredge stated his understanding the developer would <br /> use the existing architectural plans and construct buildings as <br /> g P g' <br /> shown wherever possible. <br /> Marge Harrington asked if the construction/main entrance <br /> could be pointed out. Attorney Butler did so. <br /> Ms. Prose asked if the original plan had no separate <br /> construction entrance; and was told that was correct. <br /> .The Chairman suggested utilizing the area where the water <br /> main was brought in for the project, creating a construction <br /> entrance and devising a reveget at ion plan, to be agreed upon <br /> _ prior to the Modification. <br /> Dennis Balzarini suggested Applicant and Association Members <br /> meet in an attempt to agree upon the current proposal . <br /> . ` ; .Attorney Butler proposed preparation of a finalized version <br /> of the Plan, revisal of the Special Permit document for <br /> submission to Town Planner/Planning Board, with copies provided <br /> to the unit owners. <br /> Attorney Butler stated for the Record that if the unit <br /> owners, position is to claim ownership to the balance of said <br /> property, that would be considered a preliminary issue to having <br /> discussion on any other issues. He further stated an attempt <br /> would be made to meet for the purpose of resolving issues of <br /> 1 concern to everyone' s satisfaction. <br /> Mr. Traczyk stated the land is in Trusteeship, the <br /> development rights belong to Related. <br /> .Attorney Butler stated he would contact Mr. Traczyk to <br /> schedule a meeting and prepare the document. He proposed <br /> re--drawing the phasing lines on the old plan and delineate the <br /> perimeter buildings, identify the buildings that are to be <br /> ,E eliminated, common area, and construction roadway. <br /> The Chairman entertained a motion regarding continuation of <br /> this matter to March 19, 1997. <br /> r ;I it I <br /> r i <br /> MOTION: Martine meijering made a Motion to continue the <br /> Public Hearing in this matter to Wednesday, March 19, 1997, at <br /> n was seconded Dennis i i n s <br /> 8: o o p.m. ; which Moto a se d by en s Bal ar n and o <br /> r <br /> voted unanimously. <br /> °I (This matter concluded at 8:40 p.m. The Chairman requested <br /> the meeting. room be cleared. ) <br /> Mash pee Comprehensive Plan <br /> ,E„� I <br /> a <br /> Er# The Chairman re cogni zed Eric Smith who requested the publ,i c <br /> l0_ <br /> tail <br /> i + <br />