|
Mr. McGaff'igan feels something shoe for the ind'ividuals
<br /> there,, he is not, sure what, to alleviate, the Problem.
<br /> Tony stated he does not want 'to do anytKing now becau,se i's it, not
<br /> 4
<br /> a formal request. He wi" 'I 'l bring it to the attenti,on of the
<br /> b u'i 1 d i n g i ns p ec t o r,. 'it i s not up to the P'l ani,ng Board to so,l,ve,
<br /> the, problem; they will review and d'iscuss proposed' solut,imons,,
<br /> Mr. McGafflgan explained, by the recording of the foreclosure,,,
<br /> A
<br /> relieves NCUA of any lliability. They are just an insurance
<br /> company which cared' Barnstable Cred'At Unl*on.
<br /> Tony stated, i',f' they don"t want to cooperate, a,,n,d post security,,,
<br /> they don't get releases. There is a mechanism 'to get, releases.
<br /> APPROVAL NOT REQUIRED, PLAN
<br /> cant, E'arle Marsters,/Pri*me, PropertieZ
<br /> 'Loc at i on- Dover Roa,d/Route 28,
<br /> Request, Vgnature of ANR plan. Submitted, Ju'1Y '7 ,, 19,930
<br /> W
<br /> Attorne K y 'Th coni nued irrane and Earle Marsh were present,* ey t ,the di`!seas i�on with the Soarrd from the p rev i"OUS meeting.
<br /> Attorney Kirrane aid some further research on the case di'scussed.
<br /> He dietermi,ned this was a summary judgement filed 'by Falmouth and
<br /> it was never opposed,, The plan in that case contal"ned a note,
<br /> P
<br /> stating this, lot, was reserved for recreation and scenAc pur, osos
<br /> ,and not to be bu, " 'It upon.
<br /> He stated, the position remains unchanged from the last meeting,
<br /> Tom stated he reviewed the, notes from 'that,, meeting and did ask
<br /> for an opinion from town counsel , which 14's si"mi' lar to Attorney
<br /> Kirranie�s . The minutes. don"t reflect the open space was required
<br /> by the Board.
<br /> ry
<br /> Tony stated it iss his beli'ef and und'orstandins that tbe Planning
<br /> Board acted "base, the fact that area, woulid remain open space,
<br /> but therie is no way to prove it. It was just a representation
<br /> i,s, not on the plan,,
<br /> and i s, not reflected in the minutes and
<br /> I
<br /> Legally the applicant 's right.
<br /> Tom stated', after rev iew'i'ng the plans closely, he determined the
<br /> lots, are not buil'dable bedause they, do not have!, 'the full width of
<br /> frontage in the front yard. "I
<br /> Mr,, M,arster's stated when he bought the property,, he was told they
<br /> were buildable lot, they Were sold as buildable lot,s,.l He
<br /> suggested a comp rum i,se he wiII create 2, 'lots and deed the
<br /> other 2 lots to the homeowners association as dedicated' open,,
<br /> 4 1
<br /> SPace.
<br /> Tony stated the Board appreciates, that but 'legally they, have the
<br /> right, to four lots., There are probably a number of subdivisions f.
<br /> 4
<br />
|