Laserfiche WebLink
x• <br /> b <br /> regarding calculations, impact, expert ` <br /> � xp t testimony s t zmony previously <br /> given at Public Hearing, Title v regulations nitrogen-River <br /> capacity and current available technology �at five ( 'a <br /> 5) parts <br /> per million. ) <br /> .. <br /> A, <br /> k <br /> e The Chairman calculated the original Special Permit allowed ' <br /> for 346 bedrooms• the r � p � <br /> proposed Permit would permit 314; resulting <br /> in a ten (10*) percent reduction in bedroom count. In addition <br /> tr <br /> eatment reatment level <br /> j _ is higher than what was permitted in the <br /> 1 <br /> original special Permit and the Homeowners are of the opinion " <br /> } that what is being proposed is a reasonable situation. <br /> Attorney Butler mentioned a requirement of the establishment <br /> "ent <br /> nr under the Condominium Document of a Reserve Fund in the amount f <br /> $500 . 00 each unit approximately $70, 000 . 00, farfor a total of ao <br /> the purpose of repair and improvement of technologies. <br /> Patrick Coffey commented that the process has already .": <br /> reduced the problem of further <br /> 4 P contamination of the River as d <br /> posed by Mr. Baker. He agreed r ' •■ ■ g that! total poundage Z s an issue, <br /> sue. •I �, <br /> but that the reduction in project size and improvement of the <br /> effluent standard should be considered, <br /> At this point. the Chairman suggested a determination of the ' <br /> proper use of said funds be determined b Town y Counsel . <br /> Attorney Butler raised the procedural issue slue of timing as it �,•��� <br /> pp <br /> would relate to the A lzcant. ,•3 <br /> The Chairman then addressed the letter from Mashpee <br /> Environmental Coalition,t ion ■ <br /> _ � dated April 15. 19 9 7. signed by Charles , .�• <br /> Costello, President, as addressed to the Planning t Board; stating <br /> g " <br /> ten (10) registered voters have g in <br /> a e voted unanimously to 0 ose an <br /> z. <br /> reduction n the requirements of the 1987 Special Permitl <br /> as the <br /> Coalition is specifically concerned with full compliance to the requirements of the wastewater treatment monitoring:. g plan dated <br /> March 28, 1987. The Coalition is also concerned with the lack of x <br /> requirement of a performance bond and stated concern � <br /> `= , for existing � <br /> '� I <br /> overload condition. (A cop of which was provided to the # <br /> Applicant. ) <br /> The Chairman recognized. Art Tract k, who made reference to <br /> Condition #6, clearing. Attorney Butler explained this Condition <br /> , . <br /> relates to clearing along the outer edge of buildings/roadways <br /> t.- <br /> -- toward the <br /> perimeter of the site, not internalized areas. He , r • <br /> - then , ■ <br /> ■ referred to #10, and inquired i f utilities could be :p <br /> ` included to which <br /> Attorney Butler agreed. He further inquired " , <br /> as to the bond issue and was concerned about assurances that .F <br /> roadway and, utility 1 i t services are installed properly, that the j'.'4 <br /> - Y p p Y• <br /> wastewater treatment plant is built and will continue to o erate " <br /> .r ro i P ��kk <br /> properly, requested the revegetation issue be expanded to include ► : ' <br /> "any disturbed area, n and a bond to assure the common recreation ` ' <br /> r areas are t° <br /> 1x e constructed. <br /> Vie• <br /> i <br />