My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09/26/2007 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes
TownOfMashpee
>
Town Clerk
>
Minutes
>
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
09/26/2007 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2022 11:40:47 AM
Creation date
2/4/2022 11:40:24 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• made. The Board discusses what the outcome of a 3-2 vote means. Does the Board need <br />4-1 or is majority acceptable. This will be discussed with Town Counsel as to what a 3-2 <br />vote to Deny the Motion means. The Board believes that the Motion to Deny is carried <br />therefore not allowing the applicant to have the Special Permit to open the skin care <br />place. After meeting with Town Counsel it was determined that 4 affirmative votes must <br />be given to approve a motion. Therefore, although the motion was made to "deny" there <br />were still not 4 affirmative votes. The Motion to Deily is Carried. The Board <br />determines by their voting that there is not enough criteria to grant a Special Permit in <br />this instance. <br />Holidav Pools: Requests a Variance from Section 174-31 of the Zoning By-laws to seek <br />setback relief on a pool that was incorrectly installed and previously granted a variance <br />on property located in an R-3 zoning district at 53 Tobisset Street (Map 38 Parcel 23) <br />Mashpee, MA. Owner of Record: Heather Puopolo <br />Sitting: Robert Nelson, Zella Elizenberry, Jonathan Furbush, James Reiffarth and George <br />• Bolton. <br />Walter Zerosky represents the applicant at this hearing. A variance was previously issued <br />to Heather Puopollo to install an in -ground pool. Upon the Building Inspector getting an <br />asbuilt from applicant it was determined that the pool was not within the variance <br />granted. In fact, the Pool Company measured from the edge of pavement to the lot line <br />instead of the lot line. Now it is 8 feet closer to the street. The variance was for 15 feet <br />due to the burden of two frontages. He is now looking to rectify the situation by asking <br />the board for a 23 foot variance due to his mistake. Mr. Nelson informs Mr. Zerosky that <br />measuring something like that and doing it from the edge of pavement is very <br />unprofessional and it they allow this pool to come so close to the street it will open a <br />Pandora's box for previous applicants. The ZBA is currently involved in a lawsuit with <br />something similar to this matter and would like the outcome of that trial before they <br />render a decision, if they do at all. They are included to have him tear out the pool. They <br />all agree it was a mistatake however, it still has to be dealt with in a fair position for the <br />community. They agree to continue the matter until November 28°i in the hopes that this <br />runs out before they can get the outcome of the pending trial on the pool. All agree. <br />Motion is Continued until November 28, 2007 <br />0 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.