Laserfiche WebLink
a �y <br /> lown oj' Y1 shpce <br /> 16 Great, A'cck Toad )Voi-tl t <br /> ��v�enu�ec� ey -)IlCtshp(p e, .Mcissach,t.tsett:s 62649 <br /> MASHPEE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS <br /> Decision for a Special Permit <br /> RE: Robert Mancuso 288 Shore Drive <br /> Map 123 Parcel 188 <br /> SP-04-158 <br /> A Petition was filed on October 19, 2004 by Robert Mancuso for a Special Permit <br /> under Section 174-20 of the Zoning By-laws for permission to demolish the existing <br /> dwelling and build a new house on property located in an R-3 zoning district at 288 Shore <br /> Drive (Map 123 Block 188) Mashpee, MA. <br /> Notice was duly given to abutters in accordance with Massachusetts General <br /> Laws Chapter 40A. Notice was given by publication in The Mashpee Enterprise, <br /> a newspaper of general circulation in the Town of Mashpee, on October 22, 2004 and <br /> October 29, 2004 a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. <br /> A Public Hearing was held on the Petition at the Mashpee Town Hall on <br /> Wednesday,November 10, 2004 at which time the following members of the Zoning <br /> Board of Appeals were present and acting throughout: Zella E. Elizenberry, Richard <br /> Guerrera, Robert Nelson, Marshall Brem.and James Regan. <br /> The Mashpee Zoning Board of Appeals issues this Decision pursuant to the <br /> provisions of Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 40A, Section 9 and the Town of <br /> Mashpee Zoning By-laws. <br /> Mr. Michael Aceto represented the petitioner at this hearing. It was determined <br /> that petitioner's property lies outside the Popponessett Overlay District and therefore it is <br /> necessary to obtain a demolition permit. The Board reviews the site plans with Mr. Aceto <br /> and they feel all documents are in order. The Board moves to grant the Special Permit. <br /> SPECIAL PERMIT CRITERIA <br /> Section 174-20 of the Mashpee Zoning By-laws and Massachusetts General <br /> Laws Chapter 40A, Chapter 6, require a finding that the extension, alteration or change <br /> shall not be substantially more detrimental to the neighborhood than the existing <br /> non-conforming use. <br />