My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08/13/2003 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Decision
TownOfMashpee
>
Town Clerk
>
Minutes
>
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
08/13/2003 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Decision
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/11/2022 3:57:29 PM
Creation date
2/11/2022 3:55:29 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mashpee Zoning <br /> Board of Appeals John Pellegrini <br /> 2 V-03-62 <br /> selling this property, it will incur the Pellegrini's a substantial financial hardship due to <br /> • the fact that Mrs. Pellegrini needs full time medical care in her present condition. <br /> Marshall Brem discusses the tax bills and why the assessed value is so low, currently <br /> $4,800.00. Attorney Taylor indicates she needs to investigate these bills further and <br /> requests a continuance. The Board met again on September 10, 2003 and Attorney <br /> Mathew Dupuy represented the Pellegrini's. After further discussion of the tax issue and <br /> another presentation of the Pellegrini's situation, Mr. Brem suggested another <br /> continuance to look to the Assessing Department for some answers as to why an identical <br /> size lot right next door to a lot valued at$50,000 is valued at$4,800.00. The Board <br /> agrees to the continuance as does Attorney Dupuy. At the hearing on October 8, 2003, <br /> more discussion on the tax issue took place. It was determined that these tax bills were <br /> betterments and not taxable property values. Attorney Dupuy has suggested to the Board <br /> that upon the sale of the lot in question, the Pellegrini's give 5%of the gross sale back to <br /> the Town of Mashpee in order reimburse the Town for the taxes that have not been <br /> assessed over the years. The Board seems to feel this a reasonable compromise since <br /> everything else seems to be in order and no one can explain why the value of the land <br /> . was not at full value. Marshall Brem makes a motion to grant the 50-foot variance for <br /> frontage relief and a 68,857 variance for landspace relief. Robert Nelson seconds the <br /> motion. <br /> VARIANCE CRITERIA <br /> Section 10 of Chapter 40A requires that the permit granting authority determine <br /> that there are circumstances relating to the shape and topography which affect this lot and <br /> not the district in which it is located and that a literal enforcement of the By-laws would <br /> involve hardship to the petitioner. <br /> GENERAL FINDINGS <br /> 1. that the subject property is located at 25 Pondview Avenue and contains <br /> 11,143 square feet. <br /> SPECIFIC FINDINGS <br /> The Board determined that: <br /> • 1, a literal enforcement of the By-laws would involve hardship to the Petitioner. <br /> P <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.