03/27/2002 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Decisions

Home Browse Search

Town of Mashpee v S' 16 Great Xeck Pvoad Arth DIE MASHPEE ZONING BOARD OF APPEAL�ashpee, Massachusetts 02649 � ! Decision for a Special Permit RE: John& Lillian Chilingerian SP-02-42 77 Horseshoe Bend Way Map 40 Parcel 8 A Petition was filed on February 14, 2002 by John and Lillian Chilingerian of Waltham, Massachusetts for a Special Permit under Section 174-20 of the Zoning By-laws for permission to demolish an existing dwelling to allow for construction of a single-family home on property located in an R-3 zoning district at 77 Horseshoe Bend j it Way(Map 40 Parcel 8) Mashpee, MA. ;III Notice was duly given to abutters in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Notice was given by publication in The Mashpee Enterprise, a newspaper of general circulation in the Town of Mashpee, on March 8 and March 15, 2002, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. A Public Hearing was held on the Petition at the Mashpee Town Hall on Wednesday, March 27, 2002, at which time the following members of the Zoning Board of Appeals were present and acting throughout: Frederick R. Borgeson, Zella E. Elizenberry and Marshall A. Brem. The Mashpee Zoning Board of Appeals issues this Decision pursuant to the Ili provisions of Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A Section 9 and the Town of Mashpee Zoning By-laws. l Mr. H. Earl Lantery, Jr., Engineering Consultant, represented the Petition and stated that plans call for demolition of the existing summer home to allow for construction of a new single-family home, which would be built further away from the pond than the existing dwelling. The proposed construction includes removal of the l existing septic system and installation of a new denitrification system on the subject property. Proposed lot coverage would be 6%. The Petitioner is also seeking Variance relief to allow for construction of a new home on an unpaved road. Mr. Borgeson read a letter from Attorney John S. White on behalf of`property I l owners who have concerns regarding construction of Horseshoe Bend Way' and the damage done to the road by heavy machinery when a house is being constructed. The ili j letter concluded with a request that `the builder be required to restore the road to usable condition'. Mr. Brem questioned if emergency apparatus would have trouble accessing the road. Mr. Borgeson said that he visited the subject property and that the road is l� ��iM!Y difficult to navigate in certain areas. No other comments were received from abutters. "!