My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04/24/2002 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Decisions
TownOfMashpee
>
Town Clerk
>
Minutes
>
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
04/24/2002 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Decisions
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/18/2022 1:29:41 PM
Creation date
2/18/2022 1:13:31 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
70
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mashpee Zoning <br /> Board of Appeals <br /> & Islands Engineering, dated October 25, 1999, Plan No. S 102599,revised I' <br /> November 4, 1999, revised August 1, 2002 and revised August 6, 2002 with notation <br /> no. 9 which states "living space on first and second floor shall contain no more than <br /> 2,500 square feet." <br /> GENERAL FINDINGS: 11 <br /> The subject property is located at 184 Waterway and consists of l13,800 square i <br /> feet of land. ! <br /> � I <br /> VARIANCE CRITERIA <br /> ! <br /> Section 10 of Chapter 40A requires that the permit granting authority must <br /> determine the following: <br /> 1. that there are circumstances relating to the shape and topography that affect <br /> the subject property and not the district in which it is located. <br /> 2. that a literal enforcement of the By-laws would involve hardship to the !�' <br /> Petitioner. <br /> 3. that relief may be granted without detriment to the public good. <br /> , i <br /> 4. that relief may be granted without derogating from the intent or purpose of the <br /> By-laws. ! <br /> I <br /> SPECIFIC FINDINGS <br /> i <br /> The Board determined that: <br /> i ' <br /> 1. the circumstances relating to the unusual shape and sloping topography affect the <br /> subject property and not the district in which it is located I <br /> I � <br /> 2. the shape and topography of the subject property limit placement of the proposed <br /> dwelling and septic system, therefore, a literal enforcement of the By-laws would <br /> involve hardship to the Petitioner. <br /> 3. the proposed construction would be farther away from the wetlands than the j <br /> existing dwelling; therefore, relief may be granted without derogating from the <br /> intent or purpose of the By-laws. I j <br /> Ij <br /> 4. without relief the subject property could not be used for a residence, the purpose I <br /> for which it had been laid out and for which the balance of the undersized parcels <br /> in the subdivision were being used. <br /> I , <br /> 5. that the property has been maintained as a separate buildable lot on the Assessor's j <br /> Records and is subject to betterments from the Water District. <br /> ! <br /> i <br /> i �i'il I�IIi is <br /> 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.