My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/09/2002 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Decisions
TownOfMashpee
>
Town Clerk
>
Minutes
>
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
10/09/2002 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Decisions
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/18/2022 3:21:08 PM
Creation date
2/18/2022 2:15:43 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
416
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Town of Mashpee <br /> " MASHPEE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS A <br /> �y. 16 great JYeck load J�orth � <br /> DIE Decision for a Variance Mashpee, Massachusetts 02649 <br /> B B <br /> RE: James Kerrigan, Trustee, c/o Smith& Connolly 11 Lettie Lane C j+ <br /> Map 36 Parcel 47E h� <br /> V-02-116 <br /> A Petition was filed on September 3, 2002 by James Kerrigan, Trustee, c/o Smith <br /> & Connolly, requesting a Variance from Sections 174-32, 174-31 and 174-25 of the <br /> Zoning By-laws for a lot held contiguously with adjoining non-conforming lot to 9 <br /> a <br /> construct a single family house located in an R-5 and C-2 zoning district at 11 Lettie <br /> t <br /> Lane (Map 36 Parcel 47E) Mashpee, MA. <br /> Notice was duly given to abutters in accordance with Massachusetts General <br /> Laws Chapter 40A. Notice was given by publication in The Mashpee Enterprise, <br /> a newspaper of general circulation in the Town of Mashpee, on November 1 and <br /> November 8, 2002, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. <br /> Public Hearings were held on Wednesday, October 9, 2002 and Wednesday, <br /> November 13, 2002, at the Mashpee Town Hall and the following members of the Zoning <br /> Board of Appeals were present and acting throughout: Robert G. Nelson, Marshall Brem <br /> and Frederick Borgeson. <br /> Attorney Kevin Kirrane represented the Petitioner James Kerrigan in the above- <br /> entitled matter. Mr. Kirrane has requested, on behalf of his client, to be allowed to <br /> develop this lot for residential purposes. He argues that although half of this lot is zoned <br /> for commercial use, it makes little sense to develop the other four parcels directly <br /> abutting this property for residential use and vote to maintain the commercial usage for <br /> '1 <br /> this lot. Mr. Nelson informs Mr. Kirrane that the Board of Appeals has no authority to <br /> grant use Variances and moves to deny this Variance request. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.