Laserfiche WebLink
J <br /> j%0i`� ° y Town o Mashpee <br /> MASHPEE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS <br /> 16 Great JVeck load Xorth <br /> oil Decision for a Variance Mashpee, Massachusetts 02649 <br /> RE: Pauline A. Hicks V-00-42 23 Hicks Way <br /> Map 44 Block 55 <br /> A Petition was filed on January 10, 2000 by Pauline A. Hicks of Mashpee, <br /> Massachusetts for a Variance fro* <br /> n Section 174-31 of the Zoning By-laws for it <br /> permission to vary the lot space requirements on property located in an R-3 zoning <br /> district at 23 Hicks Way(Map 44 Block 55)Mashpee, MA. <br /> I <br /> Notice was duly given to abutters in accordance with Massachusetts General <br /> Laws Chapter 40A. Notice was given by publication in The Mashpee Enterprise, j <br /> a newspaper of general circulation in the Town of Mashpee, on February 4 and ! <br /> February 11, 2000, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. <br /> A Public Hearing was held on the Petition at the Mashpee Town Hall on j <br /> Wednesday, February 23, 2000, at which time the following members of the Zoning j <br /> Board of Appeals were present and acting throughout: Edward M. Govoni, Zella E. !' <br /> Elizenberry and Frederick R. Borgeson. <br /> j I � <br /> The Mashpee Zoning Board of Appeals issues this Decision pursuant to the <br /> provisions of Massachusetts General Law, Chapter 40A, Section 10 and the Town of <br /> �j <br /> Mashpee Zoning By-laws. <br /> Mrs. Pauline A. Hicks represented her application and was accompanied by <br /> i <br /> several family members. Mrs. Hicks said that she became owner of several lots on Hicks <br /> Way after her mother died. j <br /> Mr. Govoni informed Mrs. Hicks that an applicant must develop a subdivision j III <br /> i <br /> within 8 years of Planning Board's approval. He said that the Zoning Board of Appeals . <br /> does not have the authority to act on the petitions until Mrs. Hicks goes back to the <br /> Planning Board for subdivision approval and for approval to have the road paved. <br /> In view of the foregoing,the Mashpee Zoning Board of Appeals found that the <br /> applicant did not meet the criteria necessary for the granting of a Variance. Upon motion <br /> duly made and seconded, the Zoning Board of Appeals voted unanimously on February <br /> 23,2000 to deny without prejudice the petition for the above-referenced Variance. j <br /> j <br /> it i <br />