|
Comprehensi.ve Plan. The draft, voted oil last Tuesd,,ay"by, the Aff6rdable Housing Comm,ittee,
<br /> aa 1 cor ing comment
<br /> has been redrafted,byMr., Fudat 'n '-porat' s that 'Include,tho(se fro.ml,,,aura Shuf It
<br /> of the Housing,Partnership. Following appro,valby-the",Planning Board, tl.,i,e doculnent,will be
<br /> 'de- III S e an A then fo,,rwarded to DHCD.
<br /> consi re t)y-the,Board, of electm n
<br /> Mr , State exp,. Abbott reported that the Plan on,file w'itht 1i e ired, in 2010, 11-npacting, an, efF,6-rt to
<br /> pursu,e fimds needed to, coniplete a feasibility study on'two parcels of land f`61r affirdable
<br /> hou.sing. Addifionally,the ZBA h,asb,een,aff�.,cted. The AFC has,worked toward, upd,ating
<br /> figures and data,usingb,oth2,0,09 andthe2010 census. An,update will be necessary'l.n,tluxee
<br /> 4
<br /> more years., It wasnoted that the 2009 Nniertcan Community Survey results,"were incorporated
<br /> into the draft., Mr. Abbott reported that DHCD1 rovided, an,,inventory of affordable ho using,
<br /> te figures,will
<br /> totaling 4.3%but, discovered, that no one currently,had, the'correct,figures, The Stia
<br /> be used for thj,6s p1a,"'n, but additional.research will be necessary to, properly,identify the correct
<br /> number ofa.ffordable uni
<br /> Chaixnlan Wa gan recomm,ended,review of actionsand Rtzinning Board res'Ponsiblilities
<br /> beginning on page 35. Mr. Mullin statedthat the document complied With,all, aPPropriatie
<br /> ,statutes. There was d 1 scus sing regard,i ng the cons i derati on of all oca,ung 5 01% of'Community
<br /> 11 " the
<br /> Preservation fund s in Action 5. 'rhe Acti"ons in Poheyj all,f411 under the res'ponsib Ifty,of
<br /> 1
<br /> W e I
<br /> Planning,Board and the Chair read each of the actio ns,., It was sugg sted, that Ac A'on 6 be
<br /> r n 'dered for "Is tegatity "' r .1 ion
<br /> co si 1 in regard to being able to cbage flnkagefeees. There was
<br /> 'n
<br /> regardaing-wording in,Actin,o 7and,consideratio n o,r inclusionary zoo i. b ut t1was deten',,ained
<br /> tha at th titne due-to,time constraInts. M Fudala recommended
<br /> P
<br /> w king"Action.Sint,oin o .Action. 7.
<br /> 0 V
<br /> t I U11, g& Plannea MOTIONO Mr N inmade a motillon to approvethe,Affordable Housm
<br /> J1
<br /> Product"I"on Plan. aPproved by the Af,,ford,abl,e, 'H,,'ous,*in,g-Com,nil*ttee on 7/10/12 with.the,
<br /> 4
<br /> m M odifications, r.,Ba iniisec lzar" on ded the motion. All voted, unanilimously.
<br /> Mr., Abbott will, look into the process regarding the DH,CD, fillng. A letter addressedt"o,Joyce
<br /> Mason wlcis needed Erom the Chairman of the an in Board,
<br /> a ni, and resum.
<br /> 'The meeting recessed t 8-25 P* ed at 8-,29
<br /> SPECIAL PERP_'N11T
<br /> Applicant: Southport on, Cape Cold
<br /> Location: Southport Phase 111
<br /> Requesf� Ap roval of re-design Olffwih Oaks.Drive and part of Grey HawkDri"'Vie,
<br /> P
<br /> r 1
<br /> e d 1 Ron,Bonvie was pres,en't to discuss Southpo' 'it's equest. Mr., Botiv, 'stributed u dated, s'tf,%
<br /> P
<br /> plans, whIch had, initially,been,appruv,ed by,-the Board for the uppler sectioll, Of''Southport, or,
<br /> R 1,
<br /> nv.i n b a 1 , �e dei1a bed a ttm,�er of sites that had,been,sold n Southport. Mr.
<br /> Twin Oaks section. M B
<br /> ourit Bon,vte reported,that". dur ing a tree walk for the area, 'ft as detenn,*ned that a substantial am
<br /> oftrees were being removed because of grade tssues. P11,,a:nn,J,ng Board,representatives inqvired
<br /> whether the area,couldbe re-desi.gned, in o1raer To get the grades closer to existing in order to, save
<br /> mnore trees,, The-areahasince"been, re-designed.and assessedby Mr., Row`iey�and,the contour
<br /> r has changed and the grade more natural illorde to, save more trees. Mr., Bo�nvi,e,,,s�tatedtli,at,no.
<br /> houses were added, or removed, and there was no substantial movennents ofhornes. The site
<br /> pla w ere.very similar, though there were soine drai.nage, Changes.
<br /> 11 16
<br />
|