My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/22/2000 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Decisions
TownOfMashpee
>
Town Clerk
>
Minutes
>
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
11/22/2000 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Decisions
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/22/2022 1:47:37 PM
Creation date
2/22/2022 1:42:34 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
161
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
EXHIBIT C <br /> { mutt ofttshpFe <br /> �, BOARD OF�APPEALS' <br /> ti P. 0. Box 1108 <br /> Tag ESO= MASHPEE. MA 02649 <br /> DECISION <br /> RE: Petition of Stuart Bornstein for a Variance Case #V-87-05-043 <br /> A Petition was filed by Stuart Bornstein of Mashpee, Massachusetts <br /> for a Variance for permission to vary the lot frontage requirements in <br /> a R-3 Zoning District on property located on Lot 30 Deerfield Road, <br /> Mashpee, Massachusetts. <br /> Notice was duly given to abutters in accordance with Massachusetts <br /> General Laws Chapter 40A. Notice was given by publication in the Falmouth <br /> Enterprise, a newspaper of general circulation in the town of Mashpee on <br /> April 29 & May 6, 1987, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a <br /> part hereof. <br /> A public hearing was held on the petition at the Mashpee Town Hall <br /> on Wednesday, May 13 , 1987 at 7 :30 p.m. at which time the following mem- <br /> bers of the Board of Appeals were present and acting throughout : William <br /> Hanrahan, Michael Makunas and Thomas Sexton. <br /> The Board established the Applicant did not re-define the boundries <br /> of the adjoining lots and the lot in question as provided for in the <br /> ammended Zoning By-Laws (section 5.53) of February 1985 and therefore <br /> created his own hardship. Opposition was voiced by abutters present. <br /> The Board reached the following "Finding of Facts" <br /> 1 . The Board ascertained the Applicant created his own hardship. <br /> 2. Abutters present voiced opposiiton to this requested Variance <br /> 3. Granting of this Variance was found to be detrimental to the <br /> neighborhood. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.