11/22/2000 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Decisions

Home Browse Search

Mashpee Zoning Celine R. Ritzo V-00-201 2 Board of Appeals project, but that the Petitioner must submit a certified, engineered plan with proper dimensions in order for the Board to grant a Variance. I ' No comments were received from abutters. The Board voted unanimously to continue the Petition until December 13, 2000 to allow the Petitioner an opportunity to submit certified, engineering plans. At the continued hearings on December 13, 2000, Ms. Maribeth Hersey and Ms. Celine Ritzo represented the Petition and submitted engineered plans. VARIANCE CRITERIA i Section 10 of Chapter 40A requires that the permit granting authority determine that there are circumstances relating to the shape and topography which affect this lot and not the district in which it is located and that a literal enforcement of the By-laws would involve hardship to the petitioner. GENERAL FINDINGS 1. that the subject property is located at 16 Candlewood Lane and consists of 14,922 square feet. SPECIFIC FINDINGS The Board determined that: 1. that the subject property fronts on two streets;therefore, relief may be granted without derogating from the intent or purpose of the By-laws. 2. the proposed location of the greenhouse is necessitated by the septic system and there is no other available spot on the property for its construction; therefore, a literal enforcement of the By-laws would involve hardship to the Petitioner. In view of the foregoing,the Mashpee Zoning Board of Appeals found that the Petitioner met the criteria necessary for the granting of a Variance. Upon motion duly I I'I made and seconded, the Zoning Board of Appeals voted unanimously on December 13, j 2000 to grant a Variance of 24.2 feet from the front setback requirements. The Variance is conditioned upon compliance with Yankee Survey Consultants plan entitled"Plot Plan for Board of Appeals, Located at 16 Candlewood Lane, Mashpee, MA., Prepared for Celine Ritzo, 12/12/00, 7#52597". ! !