Laserfiche WebLink
Town o Nashpee <br /> G BOARD OF APPEALS <br /> ' ` • 16 great J�eck load Xorth <br /> � Mashpee, Alassachusetts 02649 <br /> Decision for a Variance 7: <br /> RE: Calico Real Estate Limited Partnership V-00-219 81 Nick Trail <br /> Map 117 Block 99 <br /> A Petition was filed on November 6, 2000 by Calico Real Estate Limited <br /> Partnership of Holliston, Massachusetts for a Variance from Sections 174-31 and 174-33 <br /> of the Zoning By-laws for permission to vary the side and rear setback requirements,the <br /> lot coverage requirements and the setback requirements to water and wetlands to allow ���� <br /> for construction of a single-family home on property located in an R-3 zoning district at �'�,i,t►� <br /> 81 Nick Trail (Map 117 Block 99)Mashpee,MA. <br /> Notice was duly given to abutters in accordance with Massachusetts General <br /> Laws Chapter 40A. Notice was given by publication in The Mashpee Enterprise, <br /> a newspaper of general circulation in the Town of Mashpee, on November 24 and <br /> December 1, 2000, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. <br /> A Public Hearing was held on the Petition at the Mashpee Town Hall on <br /> Wednesday, December 13, 2000, at which time the following members of the Zoning <br /> Board of Appeals were present and acting throughout: Robert G. Nelson, Richard T. <br /> Guerrera and Zella E. Elizenberry. <br /> The Mashpee Zoning Board of Appeals issues this Decision pursuant to the <br /> provisions of Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 40A, Section 10 and the Town of <br /> Mashpee Zoning By-laws. <br /> Mr. David Sanicki of Cape &Islands Engineering represented the Petition and <br /> stated that the proposal calls for demolition of the existing structure and construction of a <br /> new home within the same footprint. The Conservation Commission has approved the <br /> project. The Board of Health has approved the removal of two existing cesspools within <br /> 20 feet of a dune and installation of a new Title V septic system on the subject property. <br /> Building Commissioner William F. Hauck challenged the Petitioner's proposed <br /> construction of a deck across the whole front of the house as a means of egress. He said <br /> that a 4x6-foot platform would be considered a reasonable means of egress and that <br /> construction of a deck would require a Variance from the front, side and rear setback <br /> requirements. <br /> Mr. Nelson made note of the fact that the plans do not reflect what is actually <br /> proposed. <br /> No comments were received from abutters. <br />