Laserfiche WebLink
`town o Mashpee <br /> e I <br /> MASHPEE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS 16 Great Seck Poad Vorth <br /> Mashpee, Massachusetts 02649 j � <br /> Decision for Extension of a Variance <br /> RE: Stephen L. Silva V-00-101-Extension 105 Timberlane Drive <br /> Map 22 Block 22 <br /> A Petition was filed on March 7, 2001 by Stephen L. Silva of Mashpee, <br /> Massachusetts for a six-month Extension of Variance, V-00-101. On April 26, 2000, <br /> the Zoning Board of Appeals voted unanimously to grant a Variance from Sections <br /> 174-31 and 174-33 of the Zoning By-laws for permission to vary the front setback <br /> requirements and the setback requirements from the water and wetlands to allow for <br /> construction of a single-family home on property located in an R-5 zoning district at <br /> 105 Timberlane Drive(Map 22 Block 22)Mashpee, MA. !, <br /> Notice was duly given to abutters in accordance with Massachusetts General <br /> Laws Chapter 40A. Notice was given by publication in The Mashpee Enterprise, <br /> a newspaper of general circulation in the Town of Mashpee, on March 23 and March 30, j <br /> 2001, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. <br /> A Public Hearing was held on the Petition at the Mashpee Town Hall on <br /> Wednesday, April 11, 2001, at which time the following members of the Zoning Board of <br /> Appeals were present and acting throughout: James E. Regan III, Robert G.Nelson and <br /> Zella E. Elizenberry. <br /> The Mashpee Zoning Board of Appeals issues this Decision pursuant to the <br /> provisions of Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 40A, Section 10 and the Town of <br /> Mashpee Zoning By-laws. j <br /> l <br /> Mr. Silva represented his Petition and asked for an extension of the Variance, <br /> V-00-101. He said that he has experienced delays in selling his existing home and in <br /> contracting an architect and builder to start the project <br /> No comments were received from abutters. <br /> At the Public Hearings on April 11, 2001,the Zoning Board of Appeals voted <br /> unanimously to grant the extension for a period of six months. This was allowed in <br /> compliance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 10, which reads: <br /> "If the rights authorized by a variance are not exercised within one year of the date of <br /> grant of such variance such rights shall lapse; provided, however,that the permit granting <br /> authority in its discretion and upon written application by the grantee of such rights may <br /> extend the time for exercise of such rights for a period not to exceed six months; and <br /> provided, further,that the application for such extension is filed with such permit <br /> granting authority prior to the expiration of such one year period". <br /> I <br />