Laserfiche WebLink
17. The Decision For Special Permit and the Decision For Variance, and the <br /> requested relief granted therein, do not otherwise comply with the requirements of G.L. c. 40A, <br /> Sections 1, et seq or the By-Laws. <br /> 18. By virtue of their ownership and use of the Mitchell Property,James Mitchell and <br /> Nancy Mitchell are"persons aggrieved"by the Decision For Special Permit and by the Decision <br /> I <br /> I <br /> For Variance within the meaning of G.L. c. 40A, Sections 1, et seq, in that, inter alfa, the ! ;I <br /> Mitchell Property immediately abuts the Taylor Property. <br /> IV. RELIEF III 1: <br /> I <br /> WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs James H. Mitchell and Nancy B. Mitchell respectfully request <br /> the following: <br /> 1. That this Court annul the <br /> Decision For Special Permit issued b the <br /> Zoning Board 'i <br /> . I <br /> I <br /> I ,I <br /> of Appeals of the Town of Mashpee, Massachusetts and the purported relief granted therein to <br /> i <br /> Carol A. Taylor; <br /> 2. That this court annul the Decision For Variance issued by the Zoning Board of <br /> Appeals of the Town of Mashpee, Massachusetts and the purported relief granted therein to <br /> Carol A. Taylor; <br /> 3. That this Court grant such other and further relief as it deems just and an <br /> j I <br /> I, I <br /> appropriate. I, <br /> II i it <br /> I <br /> II <br /> 5 �'" <br />