Laserfiche WebLink
9• <br /> to the Board that Mr. Bornstein had promised the unit owners (in <br /> her living room with unit owners present and again in the kitchen 7i�,•r <br /> with the Trustees present) that he would open this meeting ia�rt .F <br /> tonight and ask immediately for a continuance so that you didn't F <br /> waste your time presenting a proposal that would have to be A <br /> completely realigned and brought back again. Ms. Prose further °"'"AV <br /> stated that last night at 5:30, " . . .He actually told me that his ' <br /> group was coming tonight and that he would be making a <br /> presentation. " Which clearly put us in a difficult position, <br /> having to prepare for tonight ' s presentation, Ms. Prose said. <br /> Eileen Prose further commented that credibility was an issue ! i.� ` <br /> for the unit owners, they wanted everything in writing, they want i <br /> the Board to see every piece of paper in writing, because it is <br /> of concern to them. y <br /> Qualit of construction is also a concern. <br /> Ms. Prose stated that the unit owners feel that Mr. Bornstein' s <br /> request for Modification of the original Special Permit is in <br /> violation of the unit owners' original contract, as purchasers, <br /> with The Related Corporations seven years ago, and what they have <br /> maintained (in many cases with their own hands) improving common <br /> areas, such as planting and weeding maintenance. <br /> Robert Govoni asked how many units (tenants) are in "` <br /> existence. To which Ms. Prose answered, " . . .There are fourteen „ �i �111:, <br /> (14) existing right now. ,, <br /> Mr. Traczyk identified himself for the record as Art <br /> Traczyk, Unit #11, a year-round permanent resident who works on <br /> the Cape. Mr. Traczyk said that he would like to discuss the <br /> original Plan, what was purchased from Related and what wasq: � ` <br /> permitted by the Planning Board in the original Special Permit. ;irli ,!ii <br /> Mr. Traczyk suggested laying out both Plans (prior Special Permit <br /> and the proposed) . The original Plan contained units that were <br /> much smaller in size than those proposed tonight. Seven years ,:0 <br /> ago the Mashpee Planning Board granted the original Permit only <br /> after the developer agreed to decrease the number and reduce the <br /> size of the units and increase the open space (Finding #3 in the <br /> Special Permit) . The Applicant to whom the original Special "rl <br /> Permit was granted was very clear in defining the features of the <br /> entire development. " . . .Homes ranging in size from approximately <br /> one thousand two hundred square feet to one thousand six hundred <br /> and sixty five square feet. The exteriors to be used are ;r, <br /> finished in clapboard in a traditional Cape Cod style and have �� li�' <br /> walkways leading up to doorways, brick constructed chimneys, <br /> screened porches, individual front yards and decks. The ,OO!ll'. <br /> architectural integrity of the buildings in units shall be <br /> preserved without modification. " (Page 10-B) Also, " . . .These t <br /> units are being built to maximize the amount of open space on ther' ` <br /> property. All units to include (inaudible) chimneys with <br /> mantles, front screen porches and decks. . . " " . .The concept of <br /> the Plan also orientated the fronts of the. . .towards the open � 19i, <br /> space center and green spaces. The footprints of those units � { <br /> (inaudible) in the original Permit range in size from a six <br /> -20- <br /> 1 <br />