Laserfiche WebLink
Ii <br /> coverage by impervious surfaces has much more serious lid <br /> implications. The greatest implication comes from the required <br /> grading and clearing of the site which completely alters the <br /> concept purchased by the unit owners, which was approved by the <br /> Planning Board. Mr. Bornstein' s concept includes garage doors <br /> that are presented to the street, meaning there are no frontP� y;, <br /> doors or windows, therefore no views to the outside from the <br /> first floor. <br /> i <br /> Eileen Prose made reference to Mr. Bornstein' s proposed plan <br /> stating that (in their opinion) if the green space he claims <br /> will be landscaped isn' t changed back to the original plan, (in ,;�!`• <br /> their opinion) constitutes "land rape. " Ms. Prose mentioned the i'_ ,14 ' <br /> preservation of the wildlife habitat existing there is not being <br /> respected by the proposed plan. Ms. Prose stated, " . . .We want <br /> our coyotes, raccoons, turtles, fox, rabbits, deer, skunks, <br /> woodchucks, hawks, bob-whites, doves, woodpeckers, chickadees, <br /> frogs and fish to have a place to live right next to us and the <br /> do live there. We have them. We want to keep them. " <br /> Eileen Prose then presented a list of words to be discussed <br /> in the future with the Planning Board. She stated these items <br /> are being ignored, compromised and in some cases neglected by Mr. <br /> Bornstein' s proposal : dumpsters (there are two dumpsters for <br /> fourteen unit owners) ; visitor parking; recreational amenities; „�'4 �� ' <br /> lighting; landscaping; roadway size; front yards; back yards; 4f <br /> fencing; irrigation; waste water treatment; trails and pathways; 4 ± <br /> preserve vegetation; mitigation of construction impacts; schedule <br /> of interior and exterior finishing; quality of construction; <br /> management agreements; architectural detailing and finishing; the ' , <br /> selling price of the units; and phasing rights. , <br /> Art Traczyk addressed the issue of phasing rights stating it <br /> is their concern to assure the Town that, " . .We will never <br /> become another Southport. " There are several multi-family <br /> development Special Permits which are active or could become llI <br /> activated within the Town right now. If they were all to come on '„ ii <br /> line it could result in a flood of the market place that would <br /> never be absorbed economically. This would place serious <br /> implications to the Town and could be staggering. Mr. Traczyk gklJ <br /> stated the following: Mr. Bornstein' s re quest that he not be <br /> bound by any phasing plan is outrageous and not acceptable to the <br /> laws of the land. The Zoning Laws of the Commonwealth <br /> specifically require that you, the Planning Board, who issues the :,; <br /> Special Permit protect the economic viability of what you are �aP$�fl . <br /> permitting. You are obligated by Chapter 40A to impose phasing Ma.fi' <br /> on any and all developments. We respectfully encourage the Board <br /> to take a long, hard look at Mr. Bornstein' s proposal and request fir. '' <br /> that he not be bound by a phasing plan. If this Board is �egii <br /> seriously entertaining the grant of a Special Permit proposal for , , <br /> our land development we, the residents of Windchime, believe that iIf1 } <br /> Mr. Bornstein' s Modification which are in part to expand those <br /> footprints, redesign the layout, delete a phasing plan and <br /> -22- <br />