Laserfiche WebLink
Board of Appeals Runald Nation V-92-35 2. <br /> Attorney Joseph McQuade represented the applicant and informed <br /> the Board that the applicant had filed for a Variance at the <br /> request of the Building Inspector. He explained that while the <br /> building is being altered it is not going to be more nonconforming <br /> than the existing dwelling and there is no expansion or intrusion <br /> into the legally existing nonconforming location of the existing <br /> dwelling. <br /> The Board of Appeals made the following findings : <br /> 1 . the existing dwelling was constructed prior to zoning <br /> by-laws in Mashpee. <br /> 2 . a Variance is not required as the set-backs and lot size <br /> are legally pre-existing and nonconforming prior to the adoption of <br /> the by-laws . <br /> Upon motion duly made and seconded the Board of Appeals voted <br /> unanimously on May 13, 1992 to deny the application for a Variance <br /> without prejudice . <br />