My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06/12/1991 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Decisions
TownOfMashpee
>
Town Clerk
>
Minutes
>
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
>
1990-1999
>
1991
>
06/12/1991 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Decisions
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/15/2022 2:03:57 PM
Creation date
3/15/2022 11:41:39 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Tnfun of �"'Itts4pee <br /> P. O. BOX 1108 <br /> MASHPEE. MA 02649 <br /> BOARD OF APPEALS <br /> DECISION <br /> FOR A VARIANCE <br /> RE: PECO V-91-35 <br /> A Petition was filed by PECO Inc. of Brockton, Massachusetts <br /> for a Variance from Section 174-31 of the Zoning By-laws for <br /> permission to vary the front setback requirements for corner lots <br /> in an R-5 zoning district on property located at 100 Shields Road <br /> (Map 30, Block 126) Mashpee, MA. <br /> Notice was duly given to abutters in accordance with Massachusetts <br /> General Laws Chapter 40A. Notice was given by publication in The <br /> Enterprise, a newspaper of general circulation in the Town of Mashpee, <br /> on May 24 and May 31, 1991, a copy of which is attached hereto and <br /> made a part hereof. <br /> A public hearing was held on the Petition at the Mashpee Town <br /> Hall on Wednesday, June 12, 1991 at 7:30 P.M. at which time the <br /> following members of the Board of Appeals were present and acting <br /> throughout: Cheryl A. Hawyer, Michael A. Makunas and William J. <br /> Hanrahan. <br /> Engineer Christopher Costa represented the applicant and <br /> informed the Board that the lot in question bordered a paper road <br /> which had been deeded to the Town for conservation use. He stated <br /> that the shape and topography of the lot prevented placement of a <br /> house within the front set back requirements on two sides. <br /> The Board found that the shape and topography of the lot created <br /> a hardship affecting the land in question but not the zoning district <br /> in which the lot is located. The Board determined that relief could <br /> be granted without derogating from the intent of the by-laws and <br /> without detriment to the public good. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.