My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/05/1990 PLANNING BOARD Executive Session
>
12/05/1990 PLANNING BOARD Executive Session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/30/2024 2:11:11 PM
Creation date
6/22/2022 3:52:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
PLANNING BOARD
Meeting Document Type
Executive Session
Meeting Date
12/05/1990
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
41 <br /> Louise suggestec' that if tht:.ire is a possibility that thr.:+r;T .a�,n� t <br /> r u.... <br /> get the plant permitted f or single f a d iv house lot i <br /> opinion t1+at the v then. have an invalid M yet : .11...uldF _ , L.F -, <br /> ano the r EIR l ev ew:.�..d <br /> Mr. Kiy r ane stated that the sewage pian t red h; <br /> EIR process and without it there is a signif icant quest-Ion of <br /> whether or not it would be required. <br /> Louise responded that the Planning Board would have requested <br /> other studies and o-her surveys if it had no;-- ham the E ifiay <br /> have a substantially different subdivis-ion. <br /> Ms . Wilson s to t d that alternative mechanisms are being looked in <br /> the consulting community at for allowing the s-.ngle f a�.i-L hc;.es <br /> to be tied into the treatment plant . <br /> Torn explained that the Town/Sewer commission has made the of fer <br /> to the Bank to pursue the Town taking over the treatment plant . <br /> Mr. Butler• stated that the project could be headed: <br /> - the original way it was planned and RTC will develop it a+±d <br /> wait f or a good economy. <br /> -, <br /> buyers could come in as joint venturz.r or e3+a coul <br /> d �����..� .��� a-zd <br /> buy it out. <br /> Discussions with third parties have been <br /> They are pursuing getting the funds put into es�.trow axid <br /> completing the road. work. There is no concrete answer on the STP <br /> this evening but he will report back to the Board on any <br /> progress . <br /> Louise discussed the issue of the last batch of lots which were <br /> released and the possibility of putting thee: 'back under P?anWing <br /> Board control The Pla.nnina Board worked in Good <br /> developer. <br /> Mr . Kirrani state: .11at the Planning Board h ne�fe.� �.R 7_��i�-�: <br /> those 1Lts £ it modified its special permit to allorv7 t1-.case 0 t s to <br /> have individual septic sys te-ms but .ne v e r re le a ed its :�cvice1iuri� on <br /> those lots . <br /> Louise suggested that the modificatic-n. <br /> Tom stated that if they complete the road the covens.n. has to be <br /> released. <br /> Mr. Re are?cn e 3r.pl ained that in. a "brains to'_'"mir- ;�e ss i�i_ so.xle of <br /> the possible solutions talked about (nothing was a fire e a upo.+r <br /> t��•e � were lust throwing t1aings out f��r d:.scussieon <br /> - amend s r►�--vial permit to address STA.P to prE.t�,��-s� �r �f- �-f=� �.U tar _. <br /> - build the tr eatme+lt pl ant right n;�r•.. <br /> post acceptable security for it. <br /> - reducing the number cf building units in -2 pla{z_ <br /> - covenanting more lots. , give some that were released back <br /> covenant. <br /> Mr . But2l- s t a t a d that • <br /> L h e C� C' �1�1.11.� +ram t o �..=u- ��...,L.L er t'�'i r�t Ll [�'"• <br /> r 1.�� �.. r.r <br /> not have authority to say they would agree � y Tk,�y T,,r <br /> t a.. i. i► s S i t V.. �!.L�. �.La r+ <br /> it back t i t o�.+.1�1 a a p p r o r.r h a t e c i a i -2 i.y . i 4 i�i�it c f' /� l 1 a 1 .•cy <br /> � � � ,ti � -� 7�r �'�.� Zit•� , tir., L..�..ti L � Lr' r1. <br /> R <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.