Laserfiche WebLink
Tony stated that there should be solid language to prch-.spit <br /> selling of the accessory dwelling. b,. <br /> Fields Point feels the 5% use of open saa�:w was to <br /> restrictive. They proposed ha�,rlr�a ar,. o��en space rr.a+�a; ::rent _ <br /> plan. After discussion the Board agreed to a 10 <br /> E' <br /> Concrete bounding -- Board felt it was necessary. � <br /> 50 foot buffer strip -- Fields Point wanted to know if it <br /> counts towards the open space? <br /> Tom stated that it does not count towards the open space. it � <br /> is not the kind of open space that OSID is geared tordards . <br /> it is for large sections of land. <br /> He will confirm the wording. <br /> To allow it would be an incentive to put open space against <br /> open space . <br /> The Board feels if the buffer is against open space is <br /> should count towards open space..., toward unit calculations. <br /> Fields Point had a issue with the Groundwater Protection <br /> District. all Jobs Fishing Road neighborhood and Whiting <br /> neighborhood are in the district. It on.l;r allows 2,000 <br /> sq <br /> feet of lot coverage to be impervious surf ace includi.na <br /> decks patios , driveway etc. If those items are count:d t1,Ley <br /> have a real problem. <br /> Tom stated that they can look at overall limit and include i <br /> all the open space in the calculations. <br /> Turning Radius requirement: Planning Board cannot <br /> e <br /> parking standards , only Town meeting can. <br /> S <br /> Doug e::plained sect 174.E.F says app?+,�ant has t o a%�:�:Iyr -Fcr <br /> a building permit, which is clearly not the intent. To:; and <br /> Doug :ti=ill work. i t out. <br /> Commercial District: <br /> Doug stated that he doesn' t feel. core fortabla enough w4 tit <br /> these , has not had enough tine to review them., f aeis they- <br /> might be rushing it. <br /> Tony stated that he would like to pu` in Fur <br /> so , f or example a new b u s i n a s s can_ro t co:::e in and clear: <br /> .edge to edge of the lot. <br /> Would like to get basic regulations for co:n.mez.C-ial pr;iects , <br /> Set back requirements need researc'.n. <br /> Doug stated that they have a problem changing rear and siue j I. <br /> setbacks from 20 to 50 feet. <br /> Wayne stated that he feels not enough on <br /> this com.~ner c i a 1 district article. He feels rn re res;4z, <br /> time is 'need, and maybe includes Fx 11 t— _1, e r::t r~: {::.: <br /> discussions . In light of the fiscal ccncf!ir i::a f 4.:� <br /> this show.3. be given a lct of thouch t <br /> , <br /> M <br /> i <br />