Laserfiche WebLink
M <br />Mashpee Select Board <br />Minutes <br />July 11, 2022 <br />APPOINTMENTS & HEARINGS <br />Presentation b the )pp rtment of Environmental Protection:w (continued) <br />It was noted a town may apply for a Watershed Permit for the entire town. If the watershed is shared the town <br />would enter into an Intermunicipal Agreement with the adjacent town. This would represent cost efficiencies and <br />maximization to eliminate the water impairments. <br />Discussion followed with regards to the degrading lakes, ponds and rivers in Mashpee where phosphorus has been <br />identified. The proposed Regulatory Framework does not appear to benefit these waters. <br />It was disclosed this is a nitrogen specific approach although it is recognized there is a need to eliminate phosphorus. <br />Reducing the impacts with the Best Available Nitrogen Reducing Technology Septic System and the combination of <br />approaches may improve phosphorus conditions. The proposal includes annual reporting. The 5-year review would <br />assist to better understand the target and whether the plan is failing or succeeding. <br />For comparison, the Town of Chatham is moving forward with sewering, Brewster will use land use mitigation and <br />PBR's and Wellfleet has a mix of options to consider. It appears that many Cape towns are leaning towards the <br />Watershed Permit to gain a wide variety of strategies to combat this problem. <br />In addition to federal and state funding projected to assist with remediation the DEP was asked if the state is moving <br />forward with purchase/power agreements from anticipated offshore wind projects that involve coastal areas. It <br />seems the effected communities should benefit by receiving direct contributions for land and water conservation. <br />At this time ARPA funding is included in budget projections for remediation. It is not known if there would be <br />future contributions to this endeavor from offshore wind power. <br />It was recommended private wastewater treatment systems be monitored to ensure current standards and discharge <br />permitting is met. And, in an effort to support rivers, funding was requested to support dredging initiatives. <br />The proposed Watershed Permit is a 20-year permit instead of the traditional 5-year permit based on the Town <br />approved Watershed Management Plan. A town may achieve their TMDL to meet water quality standards in <br />advance of the 20-year timeframe which is considered the minimum. <br />To address the problem and gain reduction in prudent course Title V regulations need to be tackled. There was a <br />question if Innovative Alternative systems were relied upon would they likely achieve standard? The answer was <br />affirmative. <br />If the Town targeted sewering around ponds and lakes to eliminate phosphorus is this action permissible under a <br />Watershed Permit. The answer was also affirmative. <br />