Laserfiche WebLink
16 Great Neck Road North <br />Mashpee, Massachusetts 02649 <br />information, define the purpose and intent of the application, and the proposed location. He <br />would suggest Mr. Gehring inform them of potential timelines like when they can expect the <br />application will be submitted. This is a DRI mandatory referral, upon the opening of the Public <br />Hearing, this would be an automatic referral to the Cape Cod Commission for review, and then <br />it would go back to the Planning Board for review and deliberation. He would echo Ms. <br />Waygan's comments, tonight is just a listening opportunity and questions relative to process <br />can be directed to Mr. Lehrer. He asks Mr. Gehring to once again describe the location, the <br />process, and timeline moving forward. <br />Mr. Gehring is present this evening on behalf of Verizon. He showed the location being across <br />from the 99 Restaurant at the Verizon phone company building, in the back yard. It is in the C1 <br />zoning district and wireless overlay district. He noted this was a comprehensive application. He <br />reached out earlier in the year but had a false start. He has been given the okay to go full <br />speed ahead. He also reached out to the Cape Cod Commission as well as the town, and he <br />will be looking for input and advice so Verizon applicants can do better in the future. His <br />application will contain a narrative of the various elements of the bylaw. It will contain the RF <br />plots proving the need. He will have a sound study, real estate impact, photos of the plan, and <br />proof of RF compliance under federal law. There are wetlands in the back of the property that <br />they are staying away from, he will also provide a wetlands report showing the plans are <br />outside of those parameters. It most likely will not require a traffic study as it is an unoccupied <br />remote utility building. Mr. Gehring would like a heads up of other requirements. He would like <br />to coordinate an advertised balloon float so it only has to be done once, as there is a supply <br />chain issue and helium is hard to come by. When he files, he will supply photo sims on a flat <br />calm day. If you have wind it could completely mess up the read. He is curious how this can be <br />done logistically. Advertising is tough because it is weather dependent. However, the Board <br />has the ability to waive this. He wants to know if he should be in touch with the Commission, <br />he would like to only perform one float if possible. It could happen 30 days from now, or 21 <br />days after filing, but the selected date needs to be good weather. It has to be advertised for 14 <br />days but no more than 21 days. <br />Mr. Lehrer would like to review this particular bylaw so he can provide an accurate <br />recommendation. <br />Mr. Fulone asked if the outcome of the new balloon float would look different than the images <br />already provided. <br />Mr. Gehring stated they would end up looking the same. <br />4 <br />