My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/16/2022 PLANNING BOARD Minutes
>
11/16/2022 PLANNING BOARD Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2025 2:59:31 PM
Creation date
12/20/2022 2:38:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
PLANNING BOARD
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
11/16/2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
16 Great Neck Road North <br />Aashpee, Massachusetts 02649 <br />provision 40 years later, that allowed them to keep the basement. This is the second raising of <br />the property, as the first time was in the mid 80's. This is not just about the safety of people <br />and property it is about the safety and health of the water. It is a multifaceted endeavor. The fill <br />prohibition is a prudent measure that should be in the wetlands regulations but also needs to <br />be a zoning bylaw. In our last submitted proposal we specifically included language that stated <br />no letters of map revision will be accepted. <br />Ms. Waygan asked if the fertilizer bylaw was town code because it is not a zoning bylaw. Mr. <br />Lehrer thinks it is a general bylaw, he doesn't recall how it was submitted. <br />Ms. Faulkner asked how one determines if it is a general bylaw or a zoning bylaw. <br />Mr. Lehrer stated the zoning bylaw only pertains to land use and outside of wetlands. Our <br />general bylaws govern a lot of things like noise and he referenced a dog kennel for example. <br />Ms. Waygan noted the zoning bylaw is a subset of general bylaws. She asked if anything <br />Tighe & Bond submitted caught his eye for a zoning change. <br />Mr. Lehrer stated there were a couple things that have been alluded to in the past. They <br />suggested going from the encouragement to the required which we already started doing in <br />regard to LID. Parking reduction is something we should explore, certainly with redevelopment, <br />and the removal of impervious surface. As we are considering affordable housing, one best <br />practice is to reduce the minimum parking requirements. Lastly, making OSID a functional <br />transfer of development rights was something they noted as prudent and something we have <br />discussed before. <br />Ms. Waygan stated page 7 of the Tighe & Bond memo mentioned OSID. She went on to say <br />some of their recommendations could be done through the subdivision rules and regulations. <br />She inquired about the other memo from Fuss & O'Neill, and she and Mr. Lehrer will further <br />look into that as well. She thinks they should add under Old Business possible amendments to <br />our rules and regulations to capture everything. <br />OLD BUSINESS <br />Local Comprehensive Plan Updates with Weston and Sampson <br />Survey Beta Test <br />Mr. Lehrer re -sent the survey. He thinks it's less time consuming and the general consensus <br />was yes, it was shorter. He feels good about completing in under 20 minutes. He made all the <br />modifications discussed and he was asked to look at sustainability and climate change <br />questions. He tried very hard to merge the two and then ended up not touching it. They are <br />17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.