My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/16/2022 PLANNING BOARD Minutes
>
11/16/2022 PLANNING BOARD Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2025 2:59:31 PM
Creation date
12/20/2022 2:38:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
PLANNING BOARD
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
11/16/2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
16 Great Neck Road North <br />Nashpee, Massachusetts 02649 <br />Ms. Cajigas noted if it is in the rules and regulations to use best practice then yes, or if there is <br />permitting then it can be done. They will also have to meet stormwater requirements during <br />construction and post construction requirements. <br />Ms. Waygan asked if they reviewed that document. She noted after the minutes, in this <br />evening's packet, there is a technical memo that says local code review. She noted they will be <br />discussing bylaws later in the agenda. <br />Ms. Faulkner stated the water shed based plan can receive federal money if done right. She <br />asked if federal money can be obtained for the MS4 plan. <br />Ms. Cajigas stated there are different grants available, they have one from the DEP Asset <br />Management Program grant, and they are doing some of the work this year. Under the state <br />revolving funds, there are federal and state funds which require application and it is <br />competitive. <br />Ms. Faulkner inquired about the down spout disconnection in the MS4 permit. <br />Ms. Cajigas stated the preference is to infiltrate on the land parcel by disconnecting and aiming <br />at the lawn as opposed to the driveway, or to have a rain barrel. The intent is to keep it local <br />and usable. <br />In permit year five there are a couple more reports that will be performed. The first one is a <br />BMP retrofit inventory. They will rank and identify at least five town owned sites that could be <br />retrofit to reduce frequency, volume, and pollutant loads through the reduction of impervious <br />areas. This could be parking lots, buildings, or maintenance yards or modifying rights -of -way, <br />outfalls, or swales. This inventory was originally for permit year four but was postponed to year <br />five as it is being paid for by the asset management grant. <br />The continuation of the phosphorus work needs to further evaluate the town owned parcels for <br />the BMP implementation for the phosphorus load reduction. They will take the MVP 21 sites for <br />Santuit Pond and look at the town owned parcels in those water sheds. They will come up with <br />a list of five town owned sites to maintain, and keep a running list of where implementation can <br />be made. Once one is implemented, another will be added. In permit year six, they will have <br />one design and implemented. They will most likely have more than one, but they will create the <br />inventory for next on the list and work with the town on maintaining this list. <br />For the asset management program, they will hold a service workshop to talk about goals and <br />objectives, what they plan to get out of it, water quality criteria to meet, and structures in <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.