Laserfiche WebLink
i4r. Marsters saild that eventually lvhro Sturgis is.going�to come back to split that <br /> and he's going to need a variance. Mr., Jonas said that he didn't think we can <br /> allow that to to have two dwellings on it. Mr. Marsters said that Mir. Sturgis is <br /> going to have to redo the plans anyway - he has to get the frontage on the road <br /> that he needs,9 Mr. Marsters suggested giving one of the an easement to come off <br /> that driVeway - better than a town ro.ad - tha-IL. would be hard to manage in the fum <br /> ture. <br /> (Planning Board did not keep a copy of the plano) Mro Marsters said that a's <br /> long as Mr. Sturgis -submits a preliminary prior to the Town Meeting W"I I lie '11 have <br /> a 7-month grace per,od to get his definitive approved and he will be okay under <br /> the current zoning* <br /> 'R.RIMFO........... <br /> Mr. Maher appeared before the Board and said he was there because of a change <br /> a.n tenant at the New Seabury Shopping Center. He said there is no permit of use <br /> I <br /> 'er to <br /> pre"exIsd this resent <br /> in their shopping center., because the shopping cent- P in June, <br /> zoning bylaw. He further said that if a tenant had trouble and they lef t <br /> they couldn't get a new tenant in until Labor Day, adding that a special permit <br /> shouldn't be requ:Lred under C-1 zoning. Mr. Marsters said that he doesn't t <br /> it was intended either, but he still thinks it's not so much C,-1 as an eXisting <br /> bW_lding - 'if a change takes place in an' eximstiong buildingo he doesn't think we. <br /> -want a special Permit; but if it's a new buildi'ngp we want one. He also said <br /> that maybe we could. re-word this to exclude "existing buildainglt - the Board wants <br /> control in Cww2 sm primarily residential area. C-1 'is a centralized busines8 dis- <br /> Mr. Marsters further said that Brookline had a case that actually went to - <br /> court - where it was pre-,existalLng., the new zoning bylaw didn't apply. Mr. Blake,- <br /> man asked how long 'it takes to get a special perm1t. It has to be advertised, <br /> have a hearing and there Is a 20anday appeal period - 6 to 8 weeks in all. Mr. <br /> Maher mentioned that anything like a. penny arcade would have to be licensed and <br /> Mr. Marsters asked if you wouldn It have the same problem with retail,-0 Mr. arm- <br /> step suggested having an article prepared that would app.1y to all of these3 <br /> He suggested maybe even an asterisk near <br /> using the words "The Following Uses". <br /> to G-1 sa 'ng that a special pernn"t is requIred 'in a new building3 but not in an <br /> existftng bUilding - whatever way a lawyer would say would be the eas'est way to <br /> do <br /> 'I I U71 it. Mr. Re' ardon would have to review the article anyway - Mr. Maher '11 ,see <br /> Mx. Reardon tonight .(he 'is in the building) and come back to the Board. <br /> Mir. Undna appeared before the Board with a preliminary plan orgot to <br /> bring the original master plan. Mr. Marsters said that he doesn't li 5 <br /> ke 'the 7 1 <br /> frontage - if he had 751 going 'In. it would be legitiMate. M-r. Umina said that <br /> Joanne, at Baxter & Nye, said that that drive going in only has to be 201 wide. <br /> Kr. Mars ter reminded him that he is talking about frontage adding that Mr. Umina <br /> has massacred three lots - going to cause a problem in the future. Mr. Umina asked <br /> if that strip should be 751 wi de and Y1r. Marsters .said "yes%, Mr. U ® said that <br /> he wants the lot back (the missing lot from the origirial 38,,10t Plans) In 'Arespqnse <br /> to a statement by Mr. Jonas., Mr. Marsters said that on cluster zoning3 751 frontage <br /> Is allowed. <br /> CIA, id that 51ou <br /> sal <br /> ters Parcel F) - Mr. Umin, <br /> Mr. Mars' looked at the open space (I <br /> lots allowable. Mr. Marsters asked what his defense or dew Inition of wetland <br /> 2 <br />