My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Special Municiple Employee - 1981 - Peter Edgerly
>
Special Municiple Employee - 1981 - Peter Edgerly
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/24/2023 5:01:04 PM
Creation date
3/24/2023 3:39:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
COI & SME
COI-SME Type
Special Municiple Employee
Name
Peter Edgerly
Date
05-26-1981
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Dr. Joseph F. Nicholson <br /> May 22 , 1981 <br /> Page two <br /> appropriateness so far as application to a school committee is <br /> concerned, is a matter to be resolved by the Board of Selectmen <br /> and is not a matter that needs concern the school committee itself, <br /> or Peter Edgerly. In other words, the term "special municipal <br /> employee" is a word of art, the definition of which has application <br /> only with respect to Chapter 8A, and does not carry on to any <br /> other provisions of the law. <br /> I have some doubt to whether the designation of the <br /> school committee members as "special municipal employees" is a <br /> necessary step for the protection of Peter Edgerly is against <br /> the criminal and other sanctions that could be imposed against <br /> him for violation of Chapter 268A. Section 20 of Chapter 268A <br /> is really the section that has the most direct application. It <br /> provides in pertinent part that a municipal employee that has a <br /> financial interest directly or indirectly under a contract made <br /> by a municipal agency, and he has knowledge of the contract shall <br /> be subject to penalties. There are a number of exceptions to the <br /> provisions of that statute. one exception is a municipal employee <br /> ""who does not participate in or have official responsiblity for <br /> any of the activities of the contracting agencies, if the contracts <br /> is made through competitive bidding. . . " and he and members of his <br /> family have less than a 10% interest in the contracting company. <br /> The operative words are "have official responsibility for any of <br /> the activities of the contracting agency. " I don't consider <br /> 11official responsibilities" the driving of a school bus,, as <br /> contemplated by that statute. A manager, corporate officer, or <br /> other person performing a discretionary function might be considered <br /> to be a person having "official responsibility" , but a bus driver <br /> who is simply doing what he is told to do in a ministerial way, <br /> hardly has "official responsibilities" . However, I do not want <br /> to second guess Town Counsel on this particular, because he may <br /> be aware of some opinion rendered by other communities or through <br /> his communications with the Attorney General ' s office, which cause <br /> him to believe that this exclusionary section does not have <br /> application. <br /> once Town Counsel has determined that the exclusionary <br /> section stated above does not have application, as he indirectly <br /> suggests by his letter of March 16, 1981 to the Executive Sec- <br /> retary, then one would appropriately skip down to another section <br /> of the exclusionary provisions which apply to special municipal <br /> employees. Remember that in the definition of such muncipal <br /> employees, there is a requirement that the classification of <br /> employees be designated by the Selectmen, as "special municipal <br /> employees" , therefore, once that designation is made, then if a <br /> person designated as part of a special municipal employees, files <br /> with the Clerk of the Town a statement making full disclosure of <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.