My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04/19/2023 PLANNING BOARD Minutes
>
04/19/2023 PLANNING BOARD Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2025 2:36:55 PM
Creation date
6/9/2023 2:12:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
PLANNING BOARD
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
04/19/2023
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
.16 Great Neck rack orth <br />He went on to say the 100 ft, was established in 1987 as part of a design from a 400 acire site., <br />That requirement has been applied in some cases but not others, In The pillage 'the lBoard <br />specifically waived 100ft. and aUowed 40f . Willow Circle has no specific buffer. She inquired <br />about the less than 1 Oft. Ibetween buildings. <br />Mir. (Eddy answered from a development project there has to be a return of the Investment. '100 <br />ft„ buffers lose 3 or 4 units. <br />Ids. Wayg rn commented buildings need to have a 20 ft. separation per the 1987 Special <br />Permit. <br />Mr. M Elhirnrney realizes the project is dense, but there is zero density benefit for adding this <br />five acres to their pr 1pert . They are allowed to put the units elsewhere, but by using therm <br />here they are also able to add 5 acres to the total project. They are extending a sewer line and <br />restoring a quarter million dollars' worth of bogs. He recognizes it's a big ask and they will <br />bring in significant Ipublic (benefit. If they lose four units the economics change. <br />Tray Diller, Chief Development Officer for Southworth, thanked the Board for their thorough <br />review. There is an overwhelming public benefit with mitigation. He noted to provide fuull <br />feedback and any other concerns tonight so the team can regroup. <br />Ids. Faulkner commented about parking rnd having to Use the club house lot when visiting. <br />People will be parking on (both sides of the street and it already seems narrow. People doi n"t <br />want to park at the club and walk over. <br />Mr. (Eddy noted for normal circumstances they provided two spots, and there are addltionall <br />parking along shoulders. If you drive around any rod in Mashpee or Cape, road sections are <br />1 - 0 ft. that have no Ih ullder , with houses on each side, and cars are parked in the tr vell <br />way. <br />Waygan commented the project is conditioned 20ft. between buildings. It is being <br />contested that it was modified. She is going with the fact it is required. In a Special Permit <br />where you're annexing land, you have to use that zoning. <br />Mr. Balzarini clarified that is because new land is being added into the project -thins using <br />zoning from 1985. <br />Ids. Waygan stated she only received 5 out of 40 pages of the Commission's de i iorn,. The <br />part with the actual decision isn't there. She asked if Willowbend complied with any and all and <br />to the best of their knowledge they did and they have certificates of compliance as proof. She <br />asked for the total number of parcels on the project. Mr. McElhinney answered the Special <br />IPerimit maximum is 853 and that was modified. That number was riveon by the sewage <br />treatment plaint. She wwoUld like to know ww many bedrooms they currently have and how <br />E <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.