My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05/03/2023 PLANNING BOARD Minutes
>
05/03/2023 PLANNING BOARD Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2025 2:37:16 PM
Creation date
6/9/2023 2:57:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
PLANNING BOARD
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/03/2023
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
16 Great Neck Road North <br />Mashpee, Massachusetts 02649 <br />by the HOA of Ockway highlands. It is supposed to be left in a maintained compacted gravel or <br />other material capable of sustaining fire in all weather. By right, now the developer and at <br />some point the HOA, in this case lots 1-14, would not have been able to be created without <br />access. <br />Ms. Waygan stated this item will appear on the May 17th agenda. She would like the approved <br />subdivision plan and special permit decision. She invites the developer to come on May 17th. <br />The items for the tripartite agreement need to be discussed as well. <br />Planning for October 2023 Town Meeting — Deadline July <br />Solar Bylaw <br />There are three avenues they could take. One approach was taken by expanding solar in C1 <br />and C2, an overlay was contemplated, and we could've maintained current restrictions as to <br />preserve the health, safety, and welfare of residents. The Solar Bylaw was to mitigate <br />residential property use. He doesn't feel strongly that an overlay is necessary. If we want to <br />walk it back we can, if we want to exercise encouragement via an overlay we can. Preserving <br />the restriction could be the way to go. <br />Accessory Apartment Zoning Bylaw Amendment <br />This will allow someone with a permitted ADU to occupy said ADU and rent out their principal <br />dwelling. The ADU or principal dwelling must be occupied by the property owner. <br />Potential Raze and Replace Amendment <br />This gained support at Town Meeting. It is a good time to reevaluate and make some changes <br />that were identified as problematic, specifically what detriment would mean. They will repeal <br />and replace the Raze and Replace using Dennis, Ma model as a skeleton. He will prepare <br />something for consideration for May 17th. There is a defined process for certain scenarios and <br />a range of what a detriment can be. One cannot increase detriment more than 40% as <br />described in Dennis. Some cases are by right and other cases need Special Permit. It gives <br />the property owners choices in how to proceed and evaluate future goals and establishes <br />parameters. <br />Ms. Waygan noted Dennis does not call it Raze and Replace. It is under a section of non- <br />conforming uses and structures. Sometimes it is called demolition. People who have concerns <br />with this should be involved. <br />Mr. Lehrer will present a draft at next meeting. <br />10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.