Laserfiche WebLink
Town O, aS�L . '2 e -.-___ Aannin Board <br />16 Great Neck Road North <br />Mashpee, 94assachusetts 02649 <br />Ms. Waygan would like to work on that for next Town Meeting. Who is defined under family <br />member, and how are we defining family. She would love to consider a family related <br />provision. <br />MOTION: <br />Ms. Waygan made a motion to submit these three subsections that amend the <br />accessory dwelling bylaw to the Select Board for inclusion on the warrant for October <br />Town Meeting. Seconded by Mr. Richardson. All in favor. <br />Raze and Replace Amendment <br />Mr. Lehrer prepared a presentation that goes over his knowledge of the problem and some <br />concerns that create flexibility and restrictions. When you try to describe a three dimensional <br />environment using words it can be confusing. This has been reviewed by Town Counsel. <br />The purpose is to define what is detrimental when evaluating impacts of non -conformities <br />when razing or replacing single family dwellings. The proposal explains acceptable limits to <br />growth but does not provide ability to extend to maximum. There are no limits in the bylaw <br />that state what growth is detrimental, it is at the discretion of ZBA. The setbacks are not <br />prescribed. ZBA needs to have a structure to operate under when giving neighbors clarity on <br />growth, but further for applicants and people representing applicants. <br />One change, you cannot increase intensity of a non -conformity. Preexisting non -conforming <br />home with raze and replace, you would be allowed today and after this bylaw, to increase <br />building footprint to maximum allowed in underlying zoning district, max side setback and <br />building height. If you are 10 ft. from property but required to be 15ft., you can maintain 10, <br />but it does not allow to go to 9 or 7. It establishes limits for modest growth. Incentivizing <br />upgrades for FEMA or septic, but it's not limitless. In a floodplain, there is 100% lot coverage <br />by FEMA and by structures. Nothing in current bylaw considers height. Also, the use of <br />impervious surfaces would be eliminated in Poppy. This provides pathways for redeveloping <br />your home by right. The purpose is to address insensitive development, respect certain <br />fabrics of neighborhoods, mitigate detriments, and incentivize property owners to be more <br />compliant with septic. <br />Ms. Faulkner wants to take this home to review and come back next time for discussion. Mr. <br />Lehrer would be happy to provide a memo in simpler terms with what each section is saying. <br />Mr. Lehrer would like to bring this to ZBA and have a joint meeting. <br />Ms. Waygan has two concerns. One is using land we don't normally use to calculate lot <br />coverage. Lot coverage in this town is 20% coverage, only using upland, you can't use land <br />subject to coastal flow or wetland. This raze and replace is providing significant relief without <br />14 <br />