My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06/07/2023 PLANNING BOARD Minutes
>
06/07/2023 PLANNING BOARD Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2025 2:38:14 PM
Creation date
9/6/2023 2:43:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
PLANNING BOARD
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
06/07/2023
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
16 Great Neck Road North <br />Mashpee, Massachusetts 02649 <br />Ms. Faulkner asked who the responsible party would be. Mr. Eddy stated Fuss & O'Neil has <br />someone who specializes in that monitoring. From a Commission standpoint, the applicant <br />performs and provides the monitoring documentation. <br />Mr. McElhinney commented that Fuss & O'Neil is working with Mashpee on another bog <br />restoration in town, and that played a factor when choosing who they worked with. <br />Mr. Balzarini can live with the setback as presented, but he needs the Conservation <br />Commission's blessing. We do not need to worry about septic or any additional nutrients. He <br />would like Conservation to come to a Planning Board meeting. <br />Mr. Eddy stated that due to costs he is trying to accomplish Conservation and Planning to work <br />in an efficient direction. They knew they weren't going to have just one Public Hearing, they will <br />go back to the Conservation Commission to discuss updates on the current layout. All <br />comments and concerns will land in the same time frame and then they will complete a <br />detailed grading plan. <br />Mr. Oakley is familiar with Fuss & O'Neil and he has been involved in other bog restoration <br />projects. Ultimately, it does have many great benefits to the eco system. He is looking forward <br />to learn more about that process. He is also curious if Fuss & O'Neil have consulted in any <br />local stakeholder groups. <br />Mr. Eddy stated there haven't been any meetings yet with the stakeholders, just general <br />presentations to this Board and the ConCom. <br />Mr. McElhinney made reference to the length and restoration mechanics stating once layers of <br />sand are scraped away, you could be facing seed banks from 50 years ago that could grow <br />back. <br />Mr. Hansen has concerns about the forebay along Quinaquisset Ave. Mr. Eddy answered that <br />the berm is not currently there but once it is in place it will control the running water and bring it <br />to the forebay. Mr. Hansen's other concern is the consistency of setbacks from the road. With <br />the rest of the property being 100ft. setbacks, he is in favor of maintaining consistency. He <br />likes the wider roads, as his original issue was with parking and emergency access. He likes <br />the idea of a meandering water run instead of a straight stream when restoring the bog and <br />Quaker Run. Where the units are proposed currently provides resting places for a lot of <br />differing birds, it would be nice to consider the birds somewhere in the restoration area. <br />Wendy Williams- She is a resident of 35 years. Her entire career has been devoted to two <br />things: environmental issues and being a proponent for low income people. We have not taken <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.