My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01/05/2022 PLANNING BOARD Minutes
>
01/05/2022 PLANNING BOARD Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2025 2:52:50 PM
Creation date
11/17/2023 2:02:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
PLANNING BOARD
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
01/05/2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
16 Great Neck RoadNorth <br />wlashyee, Massachusetts 02649 <br />Mr. Phelan had a discussion with Fire Chief and the quantities at this store do not trigger concern. <br />Everything is compliant. They presented to Plan Review and he is satisfied. As for the turning radius for <br />fire trucks, is that a drive over berm? He was told it is striped painting. He has no issues, he is satisfied. <br />Mr. Kirrane stated it had been recommended by DPW Director to incorporate Cape Cod berm. <br />Ms. Waygan sees some vegetation on site. <br />Mr. Burch described the basin's design with no water leaving it. There would have to be a catastrophic <br />100-year storm event for water to go over. Our design has proven it would never reach that point. There <br />is a gradual soil that goes to a catch basin. <br />Ms. Waygan asked if the landscaping will be maintained as suggested. Lastly, the prevention of any <br />paint leaving the building was discussed. Will you accept a condition of approval be that the building will <br />be engineered to not have paint draining? <br />Mr. Brubaker acknowledged this came up at Plan review. There will be no recycling done on site. All <br />paint will be containerized. Currently, MA does not have a paint recycling program. It doesn't mean they <br />couldn't institute one. All the paint goes into a lined tote if going off site for recycling. There will be no <br />floor drains to dump paint. They would be open to a condition, but from an engineering standpoint he <br />doesn't know how he can ensure that. <br />Ms. Waygan noted maybe the Board engineer can add language for the final decision. If we could have <br />a condition stating the building is going to be constructed and engineered in a way because it is <br />partially in the Groundwater District. <br />Attorney Kirrane would phrase the condition to say "prevent paint from leaching into the ground". There <br />is always a possibility someone could spill. We just want to make sure it doesn't go into the ground <br />water. <br />Ms. Waygan referenced the letter dated November 12, 2021 going through all the different waivers. <br />Before we vote on each waiver, she would like to walk through them. <br />Mr. Brubaker noted this was the letter from Solli engineering. Mr. Burch has a copy he can go through <br />with the Board. <br />Mr. Burch went over the following articles: <br />o Article 7: Land Space — Satisfying setbacks and buffers, asking for a waiver to reduce from 50ft. <br />to 42ft. <br />o Article 8: Parking — Parking in rear and sides, asking for waiver for parking in front and side to <br />alleviate traffic for abutters while keeping safety conscious and consistent with other properties <br />nearby. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.