Laserfiche WebLink
16 Great Neck RoadNorth <br />wlashyee, wlassachusetts o2649 <br />Attorney Kirrane stated they had no problems with the sign, it meets the bylaw. The wall sign for the <br />fagade was approved. <br />Mr. Balzarini noted there have been problems with window signage for years in that area. <br />Ms. Waygan reiterated three changes from Site Plan and landscaping from Design Review. <br />Mr. Lehrer would prefer the updated sheets be submitted to the Board so they can be adequately <br />referenced in the written decision. Before he provides a draft decision he would like to receive those. <br />Mr. Pesce wanted to say a few words. The Board has asked some great questions. He did a thorough <br />review. They have responded and satisfactorily addressed all his original comments with the latest <br />round of changes. There were minor changes being processed with the recent visits to Plan and Design <br />Review, but they sound like reasonable requests. Supplementing landscaping alongside Ninigret <br />should not provide issues. He sent an e-mail this afternoon to Mr. Lehrer that he has reviewed and all <br />comments were addressed. He wanted to note one condition he is recommending for all storm water. <br />He would like to have the applicant/owner to sign and date the implant and maintain its use as well as <br />making sure there are funds set aside. He added a signature and date line on page 2 of the <br />Maintenance Plan, and that plan be signed and resubmitted to the Board as a condition for pending <br />approval, should the Board go in that direction. He is available for questions. <br />Mr. Lehrer would like to add the ONM operation maintenance plan be a requirement for all successors <br />and future property owners of the site. The applicants have been extraordinary responsive in their <br />ability to respond to Town comments. BOH requirement for subsurface infiltration in the retention basin <br />amended on the site plan before the Board so it wouldn't even need to be conditioned upon. He is <br />eager to see updated plans. <br />Mr. Brubaker noted the other condition Plan Review made was no vehicles should be parked inside the <br />building. <br />Mr. Lehrer knows there will be fork lifts and pallet jacks to help move product around the site. A notation <br />could be added as the door is only six feet wide. <br />Chair asked if there would be a vote this evening or if the Board is awaiting updated documents. <br />Mr. Lehrer would like to wait to vote to get the updated sheets and between now and the next meeting <br />he will prepare a draft decision. He would like written decision to adequately reflect the full revisions <br />requested by Plan and Design Review as well as comments made this evening. We received one <br />written correspondence from an abutter. Her comments were identical to a similar concern she <br />submitted to the Board of Appeals about traffic previously for this site. He just wanted to make sure the <br />Board was aware it was in the packet. <br />Mr. Balzarini asked if they can vote on the waivers this evening. <br />7 <br />