My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01/18/2023 PLANNING BOARD Minutes (2)
>
01/18/2023 PLANNING BOARD Minutes (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2025 2:35:02 PM
Creation date
11/20/2023 9:36:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
PLANNING BOARD
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
01/18/2023
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
16 Great Neck RoadNorth <br />wlashyee, -Massachusetts oz649 <br />public. The intention to this pathway is not to skirt any Town Meeting or application, and with <br />the feedback he was getting, many felt uncomfortable waiting until October. He doesn't feel <br />prepared to recommend a submission of a zoning bylaw article for May as it won't allow for a <br />thoughtful engagement. <br />Ms. Waygan stated the majority of the Board is in support of this proposal. She would like to <br />know what the Board can do for the Conservation Commission to move this forward. <br />Mr. McManus summed up there are options in front of them and he agrees that the more <br />opportunity to incorporate Public Comment the better. He agrees to the point about contacting <br />groups in favor to garner as much support as possible, because it is the right thing to do. As <br />far as which avenue to choose, eventually he would say the Conservation Commission is <br />going through every regulation they have and looking at updates. Land subject to coastal <br />storm flow is one that will be going through that process, regardless of Town Meeting. The <br />Commission puts a high priority on transparency and public engagement, if it were to go <br />through the home rule authority route, it may not be an expedited process at all. It may be <br />drawn out with extended public comment and extended outreach to ensure the public <br />engagement process is fully utilized. He just provided the steps, not necessarily how it would <br />evolve. They want to be very thoughtful, deliberate, and open, particularly with those potential <br />impacts to development and everything that goes along with eliminating fill in the flood zone. <br />It's not like changing an aspect of a mitigation regulation, it is a larger scope impact to that <br />regulation. It wouldn't be expedited to reduce public engagement, with previous changes it <br />has always been careful and deliberate. The Conservation page will have a sidebar with links, <br />one is the bylaw with regulations for 172. <br />Mr. Fulone reiterated that early summer feels like a stretch, as some of these impacted <br />residents aren't here until May. The timeline gets squeezed and late summer turns to early <br />fall. Now it's on top of Town Meeting. <br />MOTION: <br />Mr. Balzarini made a motion to accept the Town Planners recommended process for <br />approval of the contemplated changes to our conservation bylaws, wetlands bylaws, <br />and Conservation Commission regulations and not submit for Town Meeting deadline. <br />Seconded by Ms. Faulkner. <br />Roll Call Vote: <br />Ms. Waygan: Yes; Ms. Faulkner: Yes; Mr. Fulone: No; Mr. Richardson: No; Mr. Balzarini: <br />Yes. (Passes 3-2) <br />TOWN PLANNER REPORT <br />Local Preference request for LeClair Village — DHCD response <br />15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.