Laserfiche WebLink
16 Great Neck RoadNorth <br />wlashyee, _Massachusetts o2649 <br />inches, and no approval for panels containing PFAs. The following changes will include <br />striking R3, R5, C3, and noting 11 permitting is through Site Plan Review. Seconded by <br />Ms. Faulkner. <br />Roll Call Vote: <br />Mr. Fulone: No, Mr. Richardson: No, Ms. Faulkner: Yes, Mr. Balzarini: Yes, Ms. Waygan: <br />Yes (3-2) <br />Ms. Waygan stated it will come back to them for updates of performance standards for <br />systems permitted via an overlay district for October. It there are people who have come <br />forward with parcels, those should be considered as part of an overlay. You cannot spot zone, <br />you have to have more than one grouping. Because of the court case, we need to include <br />these protective provisions in our bylaw now. <br />Mr. Lehrer noted one criteria would be pre disturbed parcels. He would like to consider the <br />other allowable land uses. If tree protection or forest protection is something of importance we <br />want to encourage that, we would also prefer not to have any new septic systems. Sub - <br />divisible parcels might serve a better purpose for solar use, where impacts are less <br />detrimental. He noted the best way to identify an overlay district would be through an <br />engagement process. Ms. Faulkner asked if he would identify and explain why a lot would be <br />better suited for solar. He went on to say from a technical standpoint, the lot already being <br />cleared or pre —disturbed, isolated from a developed residential neighborhood, or land locked. <br />Zoning is often about incentivizing uses. <br />Ms. Waygan would like this submitted, with the caveat the Board will review it one more time. <br />They will look at it one last time on 3/1/23, she would like Mr. Lehrer to speak with Mr. Collins <br />and she will speak with the Select Board Chair, just to ensure typos are corrected. <br />PUBLIC COMMENT <br />Lynne Barbee- She feels strongly that Mashpee does not want solar, except small, in <br />residential areas, allowing even medium, much less large, allows land owners to rent or sell to <br />solar. That's not what we want with residentially zoned land. She knows one person in <br />particular where this would apply. He could expand existing development and put more spaces <br />for housing not solar. She thinks it makes sense to distinguish medium from large. Having a <br />bylaw for large, a bylaw for medium, and a bylaw for small clarifies it for people, they may want <br />medium in commercial but not large. She did her own research. She spoke to people in the <br />town of Waltham about their experience. Her position is based on advice given to her from <br />those citizens. There needs to be controls and regulations about buffers and preserving <br />residential land for the desperately needed residential housing. <br />91 <br />