Laserfiche WebLink
OF MAS�A�tn <br />IXI. 18i0 <br />FG <br />YdMUW MP <br />16 Great Neck RoadNorth <br />wlashyee, _Massachusetts o2649 <br />MOTION: <br />Ms. Waygan made a motion to agree to a joint meeting with the Select Board to be held <br />on Monday, December 18, 2023 to review but not adopt the Housing Production Plan. <br />Seconded by Mr. Richardson. All in favor. <br />Raze and Replace Bylaw discussion and possible vote to invite the Zoning Board of <br />Appeals Conservation Commission and the Board of Health to convene a joint session <br />on the subject. <br />Mr. Lehrer is suggesting an invitation to those three boards to participate in a process to <br />finalize Raze and Replace. He presented changes which will require more work, and more with <br />the neighborhoods affected, boards that have a hand, most notably Board of Health, Zoning, <br />and Conservation. He doesn't have a proposal, he just wants a consensus that inviting these <br />entities would be beneficial. They can come up with a process for community engagement by <br />workshopping a bylaw that is more consistent with efforts brought forth as important by the <br />town. We can start with our last draft. The Board could offer their issues at that time. He wants <br />to start getting the public involved. His complaints are about discretion and the proposal will <br />provide parameters around detriment and non -conformities. This requires process and time. <br />Ms. Waygan doesn't understand the items the petitioner earmarked as an issue, she needs to <br />understand what they are looking for before introducing more people. This is coming because <br />of a petition article, so we should listen to the petitioner first. We have an e-mail from the lead <br />petitioner. <br />Mr. Lehrer argued that would be an added step in the process. It offered too much expansion <br />of footprint. It needs to be much clearer with firmer understanding, feedback from a very small <br />group within these neighborhoods. <br />Ms. Waygan stated it's so complicated, then Town Counsel edited and the PowerPoint, she <br />keeps reading it again, it hasn't sunk in yet. <br />Mr. Richardson is asking why Zoning isn't taking the lead on it, Ms. Waygan stated it's under a <br />court case because the bylaw doesn't say detrimental to the neighborhood. <br />Mr. Lehrer stated the consensus is other chairs are desperate to get involved. Let's see what <br />the petitioner says about what was drafted. They can convene with everyone. He can go back <br />to that draft and comments from the last go through. There are a few provisions that are of <br />particular interests. In projects mostly completely in land subject to coastal storm flow, there <br />will not allow for any increase in coverage or footprint of structure. He will reevaluate his last <br />A <br />