Laserfiche WebLink
This ttnnscript was exported on Aug 21,2023-view latest version <br /> The board in writing gave back an opinion in favor. In favor.So it was a vote,but I don't believe it was <br /> asked,it was not a modification.In my opinion in 1992,the applicant should have gone back to the <br /> board around the same time that I was doing the same thing on another special permit in this <br /> community.And should have said,as I did,I'd like to modify my special permit to include the following <br /> language.That language would say something to the effect that it,it is not phased over 10 years or <br /> whatever they wanted to utilize for language.And not simply a,I have a question of the board and the <br /> board voting on it and possibly not.And I don't know'cause I couldn't see it in the record.It's,it may be <br /> there whether it was an advertise meaning abutters to abutters,you know,um,modification of a <br /> permit.I don't believe it was a modification of a permit.It was an opinion of a requirement within that <br /> permit of 1981.1981,1 believe is what I said.Right?19,19 80,February of eight of$0,February 20th of <br /> Speaker 5(l�% ' ): <br /> Eight.And Is the question whether or not there was any basis for the board to have the power to do <br /> Speaker 1(� <br /> That?I don't believe the board,I'm gonna read it again.I mean,and this has to be,this Is variable.The <br /> project shall be phased at least over a five year period.So you can't build this project in four years. <br /> Right?That's,again,you can't build all these units in four years.There's a protection of growth,right? <br /> You can't go in there and just build over four years.But,but not to exceed more than 10 years.So in 10 <br /> years,in one day,technically the job should have been completed at least substantially.They might have <br /> been doing some minor things in my opinion.So then they come in and say,wait a second,we want the <br /> board to tell us;or it is our opinion.We hope you agree.Basically that that statement that had no def <br /> had no,um,impact on the life of the project,there is no criteria then that says,I'll read it to you. <br /> Speaker 5 f J' u 1 : <br /> So there's no end <br /> Speaker 1((00 r 1 r` <br /> Date.The board interprets paragraph three.I read you to impose no completion deadline.Huh?How, <br /> how do you do that?I don't get ft.And so with respect to the development and or construction of a <br /> single family lost their homes,how could you say that?I I don't get that.I don't,I I <br /> Speakers <br /> There's no documentation to <br /> Speaker 1 . <br /> Show.1 think that's a flaw decision.I agree on,sir.And if that's what the basis of this remand is,and I <br /> think it is.And reading the remand itself,I don't under,I can't comprehend a board.And that board, <br /> which I sat in front of many a time asking for extensions on development deadlines.And thank god they <br /> gave them to me because if they didn't,I would have no permit in my opinion.I mean,you can look it <br /> up.It's called 4naudible>Right.Permit position.Around the same time we ran parallel, <br /> Speaker 5(tea: <br /> There was nothing that we can look at now that would justify giving no term limit to what they wanted <br /> to do.There isn't anything, <br /> Mashpee Zoning Board of Appeals-8092023(Completed 09/21/23) Page 54 of 73 <br /> Transcript by ..............._ <br />