My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/15/1993 BOARD OF HEALTH Minutes
>
12/15/1993 BOARD OF HEALTH Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/28/2025 5:02:27 PM
Creation date
2/28/2025 1:40:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
BOARD OF HEALTH
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
12/15/1993
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES December 16 , 1993 3 BOARD OF HEALTH <br /> Attorney Joyce commented, "No, that is 15. 19 regarding <br /> variances. " "It allows you to vary that strict requirement <br /> if the same degree of environmental protection can be met. " <br /> Mr. Doherty stated, "In my opinion, the feelings of the <br /> Board were reflected in the regulation we adopted September <br /> 13 , 1990 where we specified very clearly that the 4' must be <br /> above groundwater and naturally occurring so that any inter- <br /> polation of that section of Title V is cleared up. " <br /> Mr. McQuaid relayed, "I have no indication from D.E.P. <br /> on their attitude towards the Clivus system. " "I also do not <br /> have any indication from D.E.P. that they would allow a re- <br /> duction in the leaching capacity of the gray water system <br /> based on the Clivus system for the black water. " <br /> Mr. Doherty commented, "As we previously stated it would <br /> be difficult to entice anyone to install a very expensive <br /> system if there were no benefit for them. " "If you can get a <br /> Title V system in why would you install a Clivus system. " <br /> "The hard part in determining the trade off is that sure - <br /> the Clivus removes the black water andcommon sense- tells you <br /> it removes the most significant portion of what we're con- <br /> cerned with in septic effluent, but how much. " "Until some- <br /> body does a study and puts some numbers on that it is very <br /> difficult for us to quantify. " "What does that buy you. " <br /> "Does it buy you 30% reduction in distances, are we reducing <br /> the nitrogen loading by 800. " "Those numbers do not exist <br /> for us right now and that is why the alternative tech- <br /> nologies, while I am in favor of them, don't buy you a lot <br /> right now in terms of trade off because we haven't been able <br /> to quantify it. " <br /> Mr. McQuaid informed Mr. McDonald, "I would be willing <br /> to drive up to Lakeville with you to meet with Bret Rowe and <br /> Jeff Gould at D.E.P. and tell them you are willing to install <br /> a tight system because the Board of Health would prefer a <br /> tight system then any discharge system. " <br /> Mr. Doherty stated, "We know more now than we did twenty <br /> years ago in terms of septage. " "We still have a lot more to <br /> learn. " "The 4' of naturally occurring soil and the 100' <br /> distance from the wetlands are two regulations this Board <br /> will not budge on. " "To reconsider these two regulations <br /> would create more legal problems for this Board. " "Law is <br /> j based on precedence. " "For us to set a precedent would cre- <br /> ate a lot of problems here. " <br /> Attorney Joyce commented, "Each variance must be looked <br /> at on a individual case by case basis. " "I differ in you <br /> opinion that this would set a precedent because this is a <br /> unique situation. " "Each parcel of land is unique and it has <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.