My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05/04/1988 PLANNING BOARD Minutes
>
05/04/1988 PLANNING BOARD Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/12/2025 3:35:14 PM
Creation date
3/6/2025 12:10:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
PLANNING BOARD
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/04/1988
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
5/4/88 Planning Board <br /> 3 <br /> -Mrs . Peck is seeking a modification of an exist-, <br /> ing sub-division called Cotuit Park. <br /> - Planning Board reviewed the plans . <br /> - Tony requested more identification as to what the <br /> dash lines stand for and make a notation as to <br /> what that was . <br /> - Also bring the lineage up-to-date . <br /> - No Public comments <br /> - Continued to 6: 30 on 5/18/88 . <br /> Definitive Plans <br /> Applicant : So . Mashpee Highlands Trust <br /> Location: Down Estates , off Simcn,s Narrow Road . <br /> Request : Resignature of plan previously approved <br /> on November 6, 1985 and signed on Dec. 18 <br /> 1985, but not registered . <br /> Richardson :on as .strapped down . <br /> Presented by �.evin Kirrane <br /> This will be discussed with Town Counsel as to whether <br /> Judy and Louise should sign the plan and if their sign- <br /> atures are needed . They were not on the Planning Board <br /> when the original 'olan was approved and signed . <br /> This is continued to 5/1-8/88 pending response from <br /> "Down "'ounsel . <br /> Public Hear-4ng <br /> ?ub�_, ic Hearing to review the definitive plan of Jean <br /> Canning for a subdivision off Route 28 at Shellback Way . <br /> Charles Rowlev submitted and reviewed his comments . <br /> �om Fudala questioned topography and suggested <br /> -eviewingit vit'n DEQ7, . <br /> 7he calculatl' ons on drainage for Lot #4 is, the mast <br /> significant issue . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.