01/14/2021 HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION Minutes

Home Browse Search

Chairman Hyde then invited comments on how to move forward with discussion of this project. Mr. Balzarini made a suggestion that the discussion move directly into the project since it was approved previously. He provided comment that he did not object to the installation of skylights since it is necessary for the property owner and there are numerous present in the Historic District at this time. Both Mr. Mills and Ms. Paxton indicated they did not have any objections however Chairman Hyde wanted to go on record as having some questions. He did not feel that the Commission should be reviewing applications taking into consideration the current habitant's occupation and as to how a property is currently being used since properties are often purchased and sold. He further commented that he supports Mr. Gibbons and that Mr. Gibbons has been a good neighbor however, in reviewing the before and after photos of the garage structure which is under construction, he questions whether we have preserved the historic character and feel of the garage by enclosing it and adding windows. He indicated that he would like to hear from the applicant to discuss other options that were discussed previously that may be more appropriate for the historical nature of the property. Chairman Hyde felt that if skylights are to be installed, they should be installed on the side or rear of a building. If they must be installed on the front,they should be installed so as not to be obtrusive. If this is the best option then he approves. Perhaps there could be side lighting or smaller windows but more of them in an interest to preserve the historical character and integrity of the property. Mr. Balzarini then questioned whether the applicant has looked at any other alternatives. Mr. Gibbons then spoke about the original plan that was submitted early in 2020. This plan originally showed three extra double hung windows below the area where the proposed skylight would be located. He felt that having eight double hung windows in that area did not look appropriate considering the nature of the structure as well as the historic character of the house itself. He indicated that natural light is helpful for their work. They had spent a lot of time looking into multiple skylights. They felt that installing one larger one was perhaps less offensive looking. He felt one larger skylight would allow enough of light to flow into the back space. Mr. Gibbons then pointed out that there are two different methods for framing a sky light; deck mounted and curb mounted. He used the deck mounted method so that the skylight would be less obtrusive. They tried to keep the skylight as close to the roof as possible. Mr. Gibbons and his partner Erin Heath expressed their desire to maintain the historic character of the property and are being mindful of the details as they undergo this project. Their intention is to install a barn door which they feel will only contribute to the historic feel of the property and offer charm that may be missing at this point. Chairman Hyde then opened the conversation to the Commission members for comment. Mr. Balzarini then inquired about other types of skylights with a dome shape. Mr. Gibbons then said he believed they were called "solar domes" or a similar name and felt that they would not be a good solution for them to use in this project and certainly would not be as visually pleasing. MOTION: Mr. Balzarini made a motion to accept the skylights as presented and grant the Certificate of Hardship. Ms. Paxton seconded the motion. All voted unanimously. Vote 4-0. Chairman Hyde then opened the public hearing for Dean Stanley of 234 Main Street. PUBLIC HEARING Applicant: Mr. Dean Stanley Location: 234 Main St. Request: Certificate of Non-Applicability Description: The applicant is seeking endorsement of Certificate of Non-Applicability for repair, replacement and general maintenance of the trim,windows and front door of the residential property.