Laserfiche WebLink
23 Keel Way, Francis V. &Christine L. Castelucci <br /> • Representative: Gade Masonry&Landscaping <br /> Project Overview <br /> • The project involves the replacement of an existing kidney-shaped pool with a <br /> rectangular pool, along with the removal of rotting wood decking and the installation of a <br /> new stone patio. <br /> • The proposal includes raising and replacing an existing shed,which will have the same <br /> footprint but a different shape while ensuring compliance with local regulations regarding <br /> a land disturbance. <br /> • The hearing revealed concerns about the total area of disturbance exceeding the allowable <br /> limit under Regulation 25,which governs land subject to coastal flow,necessitating <br /> further clarification and potential adjustments to the project. <br /> Project Details &Concerns <br /> • The Chair is concerned about the total disturbed area exceeding the 5,000 sqft limit <br /> • Discussion on existing structures' square footage <br /> • Debate on whether the project requires ZBA approval <br /> • Questions about drainage and pool maintenance <br /> • Saltwater Chlorination system to be used,reducing chemical concerns <br /> Determination Discussion <br /> • Debate on whether to issue a negative or positive determination <br /> • Concerns about the size of the disturbance,pool maintenance, and runoff <br /> • Discussion on the typical process for replacement structures in the same footprint <br /> Agent Comments <br /> • Initial admin approval was only for pool reconstruction <br /> • The contractor did not communicate expanded work(patio removal/replacement) <br /> • Stop work order issued upon discovery of additional work <br /> • After-the-fact work permit <br /> • Work occurred within the existing footprint with a minor disturbance outside <br /> • No adverse impact to resource areas <br /> • Recommendation <br /> o A negative determination <br /> Motion <br /> • Ms. Clapprood makes a negative determination with conditions fails in a tie vote. Ms. <br /> Copeland seconded the motion. <br /> o Roll Call: Ms. Clapprood (Yes),Ms. Godfrey(No), Ms. Copeland (Yes),Mr. <br /> Colombo (No) <br /> ■ The motion does not pass(2:2) <br /> • A second motion was made by Ms. Clapprood for a positive determination,requiring the <br /> submission of a Notice of Intent. Ms. Godfrey seconded the motion <br /> 4 <br />