My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09/27/2000 DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE Minutes
>
09/27/2000 DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/1/2025 5:04:47 PM
Creation date
4/1/2025 1:31:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
09/27/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Design Review Committee -2- September 27, 2000 <br /> The general grade of the lot is flat, but does become higher. The proposal is to <br /> fill in with 8' of grade. The zoning goes from `B' to`A.' Most of the existing area <br /> is used as parking. The Committee would prefer that a retaining wall be <br /> constructed in this area, of concrete or block form. <br /> The applicant is scheduled to appear before the Conservation Commission next <br /> week. The applicant should provide a landscape layout plan, and should also <br /> show the proposed retaining wall on the plan. <br /> The Committee has no objection to the plan, but would request the applicant <br /> provide a bond for the landscaping proposal. <br /> Sign Review <br /> 3. World Gym — 106 Falmouth Road <br /> Mr. Moses and Mr. Mills are representing World Gym. The applicant is requesting <br /> signage under 174-55. The signage allowed is 48 square feet. World Gym <br /> occupies the back of the building, on the left side, from front to back. The <br /> building is 120' long by 14' high. <br /> The current World Gym sign is red lettering, black trim, with white background. <br /> The applicant would request a directional sign, in yellow, at the complex <br /> entrance signboard. The Committee advises that the directional sign at entrance <br /> could be in yellow, but the directional sign cannot be an advertising sign. They <br /> are allowed one sign at their location on the side of the building. <br /> The exposure side of the building fronts Route 28. The adjoining lot is currently <br /> scheduled for development. The large white pines fronting on Route 28 are part <br /> of the buffer zone. <br /> The applicant is scheduled before the Board of Appeals on October 11th. They <br /> are advised that they will need a site plan, and to bring a drawing of the complex <br /> signboard. The applicant may inform the Board of Appeals that they have <br /> previously met with the Design Review Committee. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.