Laserfiche WebLink
Mary L,LeBlanc LANDSCAPE DESIGN _ <br /> a0 CRAWFOl7p ROAD•BOX 1 An-COTUIT,MA 021�6'(508)42&12?A.FAX POP)428.4447,MAI fCES)G Z@AOL.COM <br /> June 21, 2005 <br /> TO- Design Review Committee <br /> FR; Mary LeBlanc. <br /> RE: Inspection of"Waterworkse.'Landscape installation <br /> Industrial drive <br /> The project was not installed per plan. My comments are as follows. <br /> 1. No privet hedge was installed on the right side-c£dri 'an1r,ucekweat-end). <br /> 2. Many species were swapped for others. Some are appropriate, some are not. <br /> 3_ See My.notes on the plan. <br /> Suggestions- <br /> I. Move the S.Skyrocket Junipers(which will grow S')that are planted along the <br /> from edge of a planting bed (they were supposed to be ground cover junipers)and <br /> use them along the chain link that wasn't planted with privet, A sign.covrers part <br /> of the chain link so five will work. Plant the 5 Sargent's Junipers as planned. <br /> 2. The right side bed(west end)has no irrigation in full seen. Plants are struggling. 2 <br /> Hydrangeas, l Azalea,2 Rhodies, 2 Spirea and 1 Sedum are there instead of the <br /> proposed 9 ground cover junipers and 3 Burning Bush. The Hydrangeas and <br /> Azalea won't survive and are struggling. He should install the(3)2.5-3'tall <br /> Burning Bush as planned in front of the Skyrocket Junipers moved to the fence. <br /> The Rhodies'and Spires will live and swap for the planned junipers. <br /> 3. Clethra was swapped for Viburnum. Viburnum would have been-a fuller, more <br /> vigorous plant, but OK. <br /> 4. Sand Cherries were swapped for Forsythia. Forsythia would have been a fuller, <br /> more vigorous plant, but OK. <br />