My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/25/2007 DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE Minutes
>
10/25/2007 DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/1/2025 5:05:21 PM
Creation date
4/1/2025 3:29:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
10/25/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mashpee Design Review Committee v <br /> Minutes of Meeting Held Thursday,October 25,2007 "� '`�� <br /> Mashpee Town Hall Meeting Room 1 <br /> Committee Members Present: Walter Yarosh, Robert Nelson,Thomas O'Hara, Tom Jalowy, and Richard Stevens. <br /> Walter Yarosh, Chairman, called the meeting to order at 8:30 am. <br /> Sign <br /> John Deere Landscapes <br /> Sign Express <br /> 90 Echo Road <br /> Since no one had arrived to appear for applicant at review time, the Committee reviewed and discussed the application for <br /> proposed 12X4 size signage on the building and 2X2 door signs. Walter asked Building Department to obtain from <br /> applicants proposing signage on buildings to provide more information on building size allotment to enable Design <br /> Review Committee to determine whether or not the building sign is within the allotted 10%. Pat White said she would do <br /> this in the future. <br /> Conclusion: Sign approved,but since signage over 40 square feet Applicant has to have application reviewed by <br /> Building Department for final review and approval. <br /> New Seabury(Rotary) <br /> Repacement(saxme_loccation and size) <br /> Replacement for existing sign reviewed. Tom Jalowy commented(as an aside)that the landscaping is going to be <br /> improved. Committee also commented that the color changes on the sign were an improvement as well. <br /> Conclusion: Stamped Approved. <br /> Sovereign Bank <br /> 3 Charles Street <br /> Don Megathlin <br /> Don Megathlin,Matt Eddy,and Peter Glick of SMMA(Architect firm for Sovereign Bank)appeared. Peter Glick showed <br /> picture of proposed bank building to show placement of signage. Don Megathlin advised the Committee that South Park <br /> Village re-wrote their sign guidelines so now when someone signs a lease agreement with them they get the sign <br /> guideline. However, Don Megathlin said that 2 of the 3 signs proposed by Sovereign Bank are their signature signs which <br /> would exceed the amount allowed by Design Review so they realize that if this Committee approves the signs proposed <br /> they would have to get a variance. The signs that are illuminated will use outside lighting. Peter Glick said Sovereign <br /> uses Back Bay for their signs. <br /> Conclusion: Signage Approved. But at ATM although sign is okay Design Review requested that the whole <br /> background of the enclosure area not be all red as shown in the picture but,rather,match coloring of the siding of <br /> I <br /> the building. The red is too loud. The applicant agreed. <br /> Site Plan <br /> Sovereign Bank <br /> 3 Charles Street <br /> Don MMathlin <br /> I <br /> Don Megathlin, Matt Eddy, and Peter Glick of SMMA(Architect fun for Sovereign Bank)appeared. Don Megathlin <br /> explained that they need to go to the Planning Board on November 7 with slight,minor changes made to the Special <br /> Permit. He said that Sovereign wanted to use their own architect and that they are okay with what SMMA has done. <br /> Peter explained the building design,,materials to be used,as well as layout. Following issues were discussed: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.