Laserfiche WebLink
amendment of the Charter to eliminate it or provide a more reasonable description of what <br /> is expected. I would recommend that the Charter be amended to revert to the description <br /> of powers and duties contained in the current Town by-laws. <br /> 5. The above-referenced committee created under Section 5-7 appears to directly conflict with <br /> the responsibility and authority of the Board of Sewer Commissioners over planning, design, <br /> engineering and construction of wastewater treatment plants and other related buildings <br /> and structures. This needs to be clarified or the Charter needs to be changed to reflect the <br /> Commission's statutory responsibility and authority for planning, design and construction of <br /> wastewater treatment plants, pumping stations, sewers and other related structures. <br /> Otherwise, the great majority of the functions of the Board of Sewer Commissioners appear <br /> to have been eliminated. <br /> 6. The Charter has created an elected associate member position on the Planning Board. It <br /> also specifies that the associate member can be seated by the Planning Board chair, in the <br /> case of the absence or disability of a regular member, to participate on a particular matter, <br /> with no limitation or specification of the matters regarding which this can be done. Under <br /> the General Laws (Chapter 40A § 9) the associate position is created only to act on special <br /> permit matters and is not authorized to act on any other matters before the Board. Does <br /> the Charter intend to, and can it, supercede the General Laws and authorize the associate <br /> to act on other matters, such as subdivision approval, that come before the Planning Board? <br /> 7. In changing the Associate Planning Board member form an appointed to an elected position, <br /> the Charter has created a number of issues. The first is that it is probably unlikely that <br /> many people would be interested in going through the trouble of an election campaign just <br /> for a position that might only occasionally be able to sit on a matter. This is one case where <br /> election vs. appointment may not make sense. The more critical issue is that the term of <br /> the current associate position, under the General By-laws, is for one year, ending on <br /> December 31 of each year. Since there is no longer any authority in the Charter for <br /> appointment of such a member at the end of the current term, and there is no Town <br /> election until next May, the Board will be left without any associate member for almost 5 <br /> months, which could create serious problems for special permit reviews before the Board. <br /> What, if anything, can be done about this situation? It may be that the Charter should be <br /> amended prior to December to either authorize an extended appointed term, allow an <br /> appointment in January, or better yet, eliminate the provision that this position is elected <br /> rather than appointed and revert to the previous appointment process as specified in the <br /> Town by-laws. <br /> As it is likely I will not be able to attend the Charter Forum in person on Friday, and because <br /> the questions above are of interest to the Sewer Commission, Planning Board and, I imagine, <br /> other parties, I would appreciate it if counsel's responses could be put in writing for distribution <br /> and for the record. <br /> Thank you for the opportunity to clarify these issues. <br />