My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08/19/1983 GROWTH STUDY COMMITTEE Minutes
>
08/19/1983 GROWTH STUDY COMMITTEE Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/5/2025 5:02:21 PM
Creation date
4/23/2025 3:17:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
GROWTH STUDY COMMITTEE
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
08/19/1983
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
-=f <br /> Developers rge' flexibility <br /> ' Mashpeee plans <br /> By ANNE HYDE requirement, lic hearing prior to town meeting. i <br /> Special Writer The requirement for a buffer zone Attorney Morris Kirsner,who owns <br /> along the Mashpee and Quashnet two parcels near Route 28,now zoned <br /> MASHPEE—Real estate develop-ers Rivers, meanwhile, would be in- for commercial use,said the changes a <br /> reception <br /> last night gave only i lukewarm creased from 100 to 300 feet under the would leave one large landholder in <br /> f reception d proposed zoning changes proposed changes. control of all commercial develop:, <br /> that would create a limited village The changes generally attempt to ment in Mashpee. "This a total i - i <br /> shopping district here while restrict- limit developments of certain types equity,"said Kirsner. "It will create <br /> the development in the areas beyond to specific areas of town. An office a monopoly and discourage free en- <br /> district,village center. district, for instance, would be al- terprise,"he said. <br /> The developers called instead for a lowed in part of the commerically The remarks were in reference to <br /> village center concept that would ap- zoned land around New Seabury New Seabury Corp., which owns <br /> ply equally to all areas now zoned rotary. most of the land around the rotary <br /> commercially under the town's by Real estate broker George Benway that would be ,suitable for develop- <br /> laws. And most suggested that unde- said he can go along with the village ment under the proposed changes. <br /> sirable development could be con- concept as long as it applies to all Only six or seven landowners have <br /> trolled by an architectural review commercially zoned property in property in the proposed commercial ' <br /> board that would decide what types i <br /> Mashpee. Competition, in the final village district.New Seabury Corp,is <br /> of commercial properties should and 9 <br /> analysis, is in the best interests of by far the largest land holder.. <br /> shouldn't be developed in those Mashpee,"said Benway.' The village center concept is de- <br /> areas. "You don't want to zone your signed to prevent the kind of strip <br /> The zoning changes, the work of into a corner," said Buff Chace, development that has run wild in <br /> the town's growth policy committee, president of Fields Point Inc. at the towns like Yarmouth,Terry said. <br /> are still in the preliminary stages New Seabury Shopping Center. He "Mashpee, visually, can provide <br /> and would require approval by town urged town planners to be flexible, something that's very attractive that <br /> voters before they could go into conceding that his own firm's plans no other town is doing," said Select <br /> effect. to expand development In the shop- man B. Jean Thomas, who was the 7 <br /> The changes would create a so- ping area would require more land prime mover behind the creation of <br /> called village shopping district than is allowed under the proposed the growth policy committee here. <br /> where•intensive commercial devel- changes. "Landowners seem willing to work <br /> opmentcould take place primarily Committee chairman Richard.Ter- toward a.village concept, but they <br /> at the New Seabury rotary. In this ry said the committee will meet want the freedom to do what they <br /> commercially zoned area, there again with their outside consultant, .want with their own property.I don't <br /> would be new restrictions on signs Brian Barber of Interchange Inc., want a monopoly: . , but if we are to,. <br /> and parking,but the requirement for Feb. 7 to review some of the land- lose the whale thing (the village cen-_, <br /> 100-foot road frontage would be re- woners'concerns.He said any zoning ter concept) I_would feel quite bad <br /> laxed to a minimum 40-foot buffer changes would require a formal pub- ly,"she said. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.