Laserfiche WebLink
o Two conceptual layouts presented: small and large options <br />o Small layout accommodates approximately 40 shallow draft vessels <br />o Large layout accommodates 40 shallow draft vessels plus 20-25 deeper draft <br />vessels <br />o Large layout would require significant dredging <br />o Distance from land to outermost dock: 360 ft for small layout, 400 ft for large <br />layout <br />o Similar facilities in other municipalities were examined for comparison <br />o Current cost estimates are outdated (4-5 years old) and only for materials <br />o New estimates being obtained for local contractors <br />Operations & Amenities <br />o Potential annual income from facility: 80,000 – 150,000 based on comparable <br />facilities <br />o Economic benefits include both direct fees and increased visitors to town <br />o Top requested amenities from survey: water, trash/recycling, bathrooms, and <br />power <br />o Parking is a major concern as site can already reach capacity during summer <br />Environmental Considerations & Next Steps <br />o Dredging costs and requirements detailed in a separate memo <br />o Impacts on existing moorings and adjacent property owners must be considered <br />o Alternative design concept mentioned: creating bulkhead along town property <br />o Climate change impacts assessed – site may have limited vulnerability due to <br />elevation <br />o Final recommendations include further public outreach, expert engineering <br />assessment <br />o Seaport Economic Council identified as potential funding source (would require <br />town matching funds) <br />o Committee members expressed that the study was detailed and well presented <br /> <br /> Review of the shuttle service memo – To be discussed at next meeting <br /> Review of the Woods Hole Group memo – To be discussed at next meeting <br /> Review plan timeline: upcoming meeting dates, BOS presentation, public outreach <br />event, Tribal input and dedicated review period – To be discussed at next meeting <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />ADJOURNMENT <br /> <br />10:38 Mr. Noonan made a motion to adjourn the meeting, which was seconded by Mr. <br />McManus. <br />Motion passed unanimously <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br /> <br />