04/23/2025 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes

Home Browse Search

MASHPEE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS MEETING MINUTES APRIL 23, 2025 119 Daniels Island Road: New Seabury Homes, LLC request a Variance under §174-33 of the Zoning Bylaws, and MGL Ch. 131 §40. Proposed construction of a single-family dwelling and associated site work shall be setback at least fifty (50) feet from any water or wetland on property located in an R-3 and within the New Seabury Special Permit District (1964), Map 105, Parcels 285 8v 286, Mashpee, MA. (Continued from 3126125, and 4123125 hearings at the request of the Attorney). Mr. Caggiano read the public hearing notice into the record. Mr. Milbury read a letter submitted by Attorney Rob Mills requesting a continuance until May 14, 2025. Mr. Reidy made a motion that the Board accept the continuance until Wednesday, May 14, 2025. Mr. Ganzenmuller second. All were in favor. 9 Santuit Lane : Owner, R Investments, LLC requests a Special Permit under §174-17.1 of the Zoning Bylaws to raze a pre-existing, nonconforming single- family residential structure and replace it with a new single-family residential structure and garage on property located in an R-5 Zoning District, Map 30, Parcel 15, Mashpee, MA. (Continued from March 12, 2025 at the request of the Attorney). Sitting on this hearing are Ms. Sangeleer, Mr. Goldstein, Mr. Furbush, Mr. Caggiano, and Mr. Ganzenmuller. Attorney Brian Wall presented. Also present was Mr. Mike Borselli with Falmouth Engineering. The project consists of razing and replacing the existing dwelling. The existing house is situated too close to the pond. The proposed house will be reconstructed further away from the pond. It will comply with front, rear and side yard setbacks. The lot coverage will slightly increase but it will comply with lot coverage. It has been approved by the Conservation Commission, and Board of Health. At the last meeting there were two issues with both the site plan and house plans. Mr. Goldstein noted that there was an inconsistency with the house plans. The site plan showed the deck extending the entire length of the rear of the house, and the house plans did not show the same. The other issue was that Mr. Morris said that the septic system in the front of the property had to be raised because of the water table and the retaining wall that surrounds it. The width of wall was deemed to be a structure and was too close to the lot line. The plan was revised to show the re- design of the wall. Instead of using concrete blocks that were 2 ft. thick, there will be a poured concrete wall constructed 8 inches thick, and will be under 100 sq. ft. and moved 5 ft. away from the lot line. 6